Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;42(3):302-12.
doi: 10.1177/1090198114557129. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

Development of an interactive social media tool for parents with concerns about vaccines

Jo Ann Shoup  1 , Nicole M Wagner  1 , Courtney R Kraus  1 , Komal J Narwaney  1 , Kristin S Goddard  1 , Jason M Glanz  2
Affiliations

Development of an interactive social media tool for parents with concerns about vaccines

Jo Ann Shoup et al. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Describe a process for designing, building, and evaluating a theory-driven social media intervention tool to help reduce parental concerns about vaccination.

Method: We developed an interactive web-based tool using quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g., survey, focus groups, individual interviews, and usability testing).

Results: Survey results suggested that social media may represent an effective intervention tool to help parents make informed decisions about vaccination for their children. Focus groups and interviews revealed four main themes for development of the tool: Parents wanted information describing both benefits and risks of vaccination, transparency of sources of information, moderation of the tool by an expert, and ethnic and racial diversity in the visual display of people. Usability testing showed that parents were satisfied with the usability of the tool but had difficulty with performing some of the informational searches. Based on focus groups, interviews, and usability evaluations, we made additional revisions to the tool's content, design, functionality, and overall look and feel.

Conclusion: Engaging parents at all stages of development is critical when designing a tool to address concerns about childhood vaccines. Although this can be both resource- and time-intensive, the redesigned tool is more likely to be accepted and used by parents. Next steps involve a formal evaluation through a randomized trial.

Keywords: evaluation; interactive technologies; usability; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prototype welcome page changes: (A) Premodification; (B) Postmodification: Navigation buttons added, color and font changed, logo added, graphics changed, and page shortened.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Vaccine ingredients spreadsheet information changes: (A) Premodification; (B) Postmodification: Change in visual layout, adding tabbed buttons for each vaccine (shown is DTaP vaccine).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bangor A, Kortum PT, & Miller JT (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 574–594.
    1. Betsch C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T, & Ulshöfer C (2010). The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 446–455. - PubMed
    1. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, McCaul KD, & Weinstein ND (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. - PubMed
    1. Brooke J (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale In Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, & McClelland IL (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
    1. Chou WYS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, & Hesse BW (2009). Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e48. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types