Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496
- PMID: 25414081
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13186
Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496
Abstract
Objectives: To identify risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery.
Design: Observational study, nested within a randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Two university-affiliated maternity hospitals.
Sample: A cohort of 478 nulliparous women at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) undergoing instrumental delivery.
Methods: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
Main outcome measures: Risk factors for suboptimal application of vacuum or forceps, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and the sequential use of instruments, second operator, and caesarean section following failed instrumental delivery.
Results: Instrument placement was suboptimal in 138 of 478 (28.8%) deliveries. Factors associated with suboptimal instrument placement included fetal malposition (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.62-3.66), mid-cavity station (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.02-2.78), and forceps as the primary instrument (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.33-3.04). Compared with optimal instrument placement, suboptimal placement was associated with prolonged hospital stay (adjusted OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.30-4.02) and neonatal trauma (adjusted OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.85-9.72). Suboptimal placement was associated with a greater use of sequential instruments (adjusted OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.94-8.23) and caesarean section for failed instrumental delivery (adjusted OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.10-13.16). The mean decision to delivery interval (DDI) was 4 minutes longer in the suboptimal group (95% CI 2.1-5.9 minutes).
Conclusions: Suboptimal instrument placement is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and procedural complications. Greater attention should be focused on instrument placement when training obstetricians for instrumental delivery.
Keywords: Instrument placement; instrumental delivery; morbidity; observational study.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
Instrument placement is sub-optimal in three of ten attempted operative vaginal deliveries.BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):564. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13220. Epub 2014 Dec 4. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 25471237 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
