Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;9(4):504-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9618-x.

Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research

Affiliations

Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research

Sjoerd P F T Nota et al. Hand (N Y). 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is a need to determine the difference in response to mail, e-mail, and phone in clinical research surveys.

Methods: We enrolled 150 new and follow-up patients presenting to our hand and upper extremity department. Patients were assigned to complete a survey by mail, e-mail, or phone 3 months after enrollment, altering the follow-up method every 5 patients, until we had 3 groups of 50 patients. At initial enrollment and at 3 month follow-up (range 2-5 months), patients completed the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), the short version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and rated their pain intensity.

Results: The percent of patients that completed the survey was 34 % for mail, 24 % for e-mail, and 80 % for phone. Factors associated with responding to the survey were older age, nonsmoking, and lower pain intensity. Working full-time was associated with not responding.

Conclusions: The response rate to survey by phone is significantly higher than by mail or e-mail. Younger age, smoking, higher pain intensity, and working full-time are associated with not responding.

Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic I.

Keywords: E-mail; Follow-up evaluation; Hand surgery research; Mail; Phone.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bot AGJ, Anderson JA, Neuhaus V, Ring D. Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. Springer US. 2013;471(10):3237–3242. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3126-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dallosso HM, Matthews RJ, McGrother CW, Clarke M, Perry SI, Shaw C, et al. An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms. BJU International. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2003;91(7):631–636. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04172.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erhart M, Wetzel RM, Krügel A, Ravens-Sieberer U. Effects of phone versus mail survey methods on the measurement of health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents. BMC Public Health. BioMed Central Ltd. 2009;9(1):491. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-491. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hwang RW, Ring D. Pain and disability related to osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Microsurg. Springer-Verlag. 2011;3(2):63–65. doi: 10.1007/s12593-011-0047-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. The Tromsø Heart Study: responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ? Scand J Public Health. 1988;16(2):101–104. - PubMed