Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 1;3(2):14.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2014.05.03.

Drug designs fulfilling the requirements of clinical trials aiming at personalizing medicine

Affiliations

Drug designs fulfilling the requirements of clinical trials aiming at personalizing medicine

Sumithra J Mandrekar et al. Chin Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

In the current era of stratified medicine and biomarker-driven therapies, the focus has shifted from predictions based on the traditional anatomic staging systems to guide the choice of treatment for an individual patient to an integrated approach using the genetic makeup of the tumor and the genotype of the patient. The clinical trial designs utilized in the developmental pathway for biomarkers and biomarker-directed therapies from discovery to clinical practice are rapidly evolving. While several issues need careful consideration, two critical issues that surround the validation of biomarkers are the choice of the clinical trial design (which is based on the strength of the preliminary evidence and marker prevalence), and biomarker assay related issues surrounding the marker assessment methods such as the reliability and reproducibility of the assay. In this review, we focus on trial designs aiming at personalized medicine in the context of early phase trials for initial marker validation, as well as in the context of larger definitive trials. Designs for biomarker validation are broadly classified as retrospective (i.e., using data from previously well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) versus prospective (enrichment, all-comers, hybrid or adaptive). We believe that the systematic evaluation and implementation of these design strategies are essential to accelerate the clinical validation of biomarker guided therapy.

Keywords: All-comers design; adaptive design; biomarker; enrichment design; hybrid design; randomized controlled trial (RCT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phase III Marker Validation Combination Design Strategy (Tailor): enrichment followed by a biomarker stratified design. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FISH, fluorescent in-situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phase III Marker validation combination design strategy (0601): enrichment followed by a marker-based strategy design. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ALCHEMIST trial design for early stage resectable lung disease. ALCHEMIST, adjuvant lung cancer enrichment marker identification and sequencing trial; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
Figure 4
Figure 4
M-PACT trial design (endpoints: response rate and progression-free survival). M-PACT, molecular profiling-based assignment of cancer therapeutics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
NCI-MATCH trial design (endpoints: response rate and 6-month progression-free survival rate). NCI-MATCH, National Cancer Institute molecular analysis for therapy choice; DP, disease progression.

References

    1. Hammond ME, Taube SE. Issues and barriers to development of clinically useful tumor markers: a development pathway proposal. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:213–21. - PubMed
    1. Sargent DJ, Mandrekar SJ. Statistical issues in the validation of prognostic, predictive, and surrogate biomarkers. Clin Trials. 2013;10:647–52. - PubMed
    1. Mandrekar SJ, Sargent DJ. Clinical Trial Designs for Biomarker Evaluation. Personalized Medicine in Oncology. 2012 May;1(1) Biomarkers.
    1. Mandrekar SJ, Sargent DJ. Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4027–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteria. Stat Med. 1989;8:431–40. - PubMed