Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;134(6):968e-980e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000722.

Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction

Matthew M Hanasono et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Learning objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Select appropriate local and pedicled flaps for oral cavity reconstruction based on the location and extent of the defect and donor-site characteristics. 2. Understand the functions of the tongue and select the appropriate reconstructive technique based on the size and location of the glossectomy defect. 3. Understand the advantages and disadvantages of treating various maxillectomy defects with prosthetics, soft-tissue pedicled and free flaps, and osteocutaneous free flaps. 4. Conceptualize a reconstructive algorithm for the hypopharynx based on the extent of circumference resected and need to replace external neck skin. 5. Understand advantages of the fibula over other osteocutaneous flaps for mandible reconstruction.

Summary: Head and neck defects are among the most challenging for the reconstructive surgeon because of the intimate relationship between form and function in this anatomical area. Microsurgical techniques have improved outcomes for these procedures by expanding the available reconstructive methods beyond the limitations of traditional pedicled flaps, although the pectoralis flap remains a useful workhorse option. This article reviews current surgical techniques for reconstruction of the oral cavity, maxilla, hypopharynx, and mandible in the cancer patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pribaz J, Stephens W, Crespo L, Gifford G. A new intraoral flap: Facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:421–429
    1. Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: Indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:115–123
    1. Martin D, Pascal JF, Baudet J, et al. The submental island flap: A new donor site. Anatomy and clinical applications as a free or pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:867–873
    1. Chepeha DB, Teknos TN, Shargorodsky J, et al. Rectangle tongue template for reconstruction of the hemiglossectomy defect. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:993–998
    1. Hsiao HT, Leu YS, Liu CJ, Tung KY, Lin CC. Radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: Functional assessment of swallowing and speech. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;24:85–88