Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;54(7):667-75.
doi: 10.1177/0009922814559379. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

Real-time electronic medical record alerts increase high blood pressure recognition in children

Affiliations

Real-time electronic medical record alerts increase high blood pressure recognition in children

Tammy M Brady et al. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric hypertension remains largely unrecognized. We hypothesized that an electronic medical record (EMR) alert would increase elevated blood pressure (BP) recognition in a pediatric primary care setting.

Study design: Pre-post evaluation of a real-time EMR alert and one-time provider educational session. A total of 1305 encounters of children 3 to 21 years with elevated intake BP and no prior hypertension diagnosis were included. Elevated BP recognition and relationship of recognition with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors during the intervention was compared with an historical control.

Results: Recognition increased from 12.5% to 42% (P < .001). Recognition increased soon after alert implementation and was sustained without evidence of "alert fatigue." During both periods, presence of CVD risk factors was associated with recognition. However, the magnitude was lesser in the intervention period.

Conclusions: Real-time EMR alerts substantially increase elevated BP recognition in children. However, underrecognition of elevated BP persisted, highlighting the need for additional strategies to improve provider recognition.

Keywords: automated; cardiovascular health; computer alert; electronic health record; hypertension; pediatrics; primary care; quality improvement; screening; triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of included encounters and provider recognition in the intervention period. *Some providers repeated BP and planned an additional BP measurement/ordered an evaluation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of elevated blood pressure measurements recognized by providers during the pre-intervention and intervention periods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence ratios of elevated blood pressure recognition by various characteristics during the pre-intervention and intervention periods.

References

    1. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128(suppl 5):S213–S256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114:555–576. - PubMed
    1. Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, Cabana MD, Sutherland SM, Patel AI. Hypertension screening during ambulatory pediatric visits in the United States, 2000–2009. Pediatrics. 2012;130:604–610. - PubMed
    1. Brady TM, Solomon BS, Neu AM, Siberry GK, Parekh RS. Patient-, provider-, and clinic-level predictors of unrecognized elevated blood pressure in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1286–e1293. - PubMed
    1. Ricke TL, Hendry PL, Kalynych C, Buzaianu EM, Kumar V, Redfield C. Incidence and recognition of elevated triage blood pressure in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:922–927. - PubMed

Publication types