Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;21(2):107-125.

Bilingualism: A Pearl to Overcome Certain Perils of Cochlear Implants

Affiliations

Bilingualism: A Pearl to Overcome Certain Perils of Cochlear Implants

Tom Humphries et al. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2014.

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CI) have demonstrated success in improving young deaf children's speech and low-level speech awareness across a range of auditory functions, but this success is highly variable, and how this success correlates to high-level language development is even more variable. Prevalence on the success rate of CI as an outcome for language development is difficult to obtain because studies vary widely in methodology and variables of interest, and because not all cochlear implant technology (which continues to evolve) is the same. Still, even if the notion of treatment failure is limited narrowly to those who gain no auditory benefit from CI in that they cannot discriminate among ambient noises, the reported treatment failure rate is high enough to call into question the current lack of consideration of alternative approaches to ensure young deaf children's language development. Recent research has highlighted the risks of delaying language input during critical periods of brain development with concomitant consequences for cognitive and social skills. As a result, we propose that before, during, and after implantation deaf children learn a sign language along with a spoken language to ensure their maximal language development and optimal long-term developmental outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acredolo L, Goodwyn S. Symbolic gesturing in language development: A case study. Human Development. 1985;28(1):40–49.
    1. Acredolo L, Goodwyn S. Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development. 1988;59(2):450–466. - PubMed
    1. Acredolo L, Goodwyn S. Sign language in babies: The significance of symbolic gesturing for understanding language development. In: Vasta R, editor. Annals of child development. Vol. 7. London: Jessica Kingsley; 1990. pp. 1–42.
    1. Ahlgren I, Hyltenstam K, editors. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf. Vol. 27. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press; 1994. Bilingualism in deaf education: Proceedings of the International Conferences on Bilingualism in Deaf Education, Stockholm, Sweden. [special issue]
    1. Allen TE, Hwang Y, Stansky A. Measuring factors that predict deaf students’ reading abilities: The VL2 Toolkit Project design and early findings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of College Educators of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; New Orleans, LA. 2009. Mar,

LinkOut - more resources