Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Fall;41(3):103-12.

Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology

Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology

Vivien W Chen et al. J Registry Manag. 2014 Fall.

Abstract

Following the Institute of Medicine's 2009 report on the national priorities for comparative effectiveness research (CER), funding for support of CER became available in 2009 through the American Recovery and Re-investment Act. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) received funding to enhance the infrastructure of population-based cancer registries and to expand registry data collection to support CER. The CDC established 10 specialized registries within the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) to enhance data collection for all cancers and to address targeted CER questions, including the clinical use and prognostic value of specific biomarkers. The project also included a special focus on detailed first course of treatment for cancers of the breast, colon, and rectum, as well as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) diagnosed in 2011. This paper describes the methodology and the work conducted by the CDC and the NPCR specialized registries in collecting data for the 4 special focused cancers, including the selection of additional data variables, development of data collection tools and software modifications, institutional review board approvals, training, collection of detailed first course of treatment, and quality assurance. It also presents the characteristics of the study population and discusses the strengths and limitations of using population-based cancer registries to support CER as well as the potential future role of population-based cancer registries in assessing the quality of patient care and cancer control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Board on Health Care Services . Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2009.
    1. Fritz AG. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology: ICD-O. 3rd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2000.
    1. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries . Record Layout Version 12.1. 15th ed. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; Springfield, IL: 2010. Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume II: Data Standards and Data Dictionary.
    1. Greene FL, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society . AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Springer; New York, NY: 2002.
    1. Edge SB, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society . AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: Fiom the AJCC Cancel Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer; New York, NY: 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources