Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Feb;175(2):196-204.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5420.

Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by basic vs advanced life support

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by basic vs advanced life support

Prachi Sanghavi et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Importance: Most out-of-hospital cardiac arrests receiving emergency medical services in the United States are treated by ambulance service providers trained in advanced life support (ALS), but supporting evidence for the use of ALS over basic life support (BLS) is limited.

Objective: To compare the effects of BLS and ALS on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Design, setting, and participants: Observational cohort study of a nationally representative sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries from nonrural counties who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 1, 2009, and October 2, 2011, and for whom ALS or BLS ambulance services were billed to Medicare (31,292 ALS cases and 1643 BLS cases). Propensity score methods were used to compare the effects of ALS and BLS on patient survival, neurological performance, and medical spending after cardiac arrest.

Main outcomes and measures: Survival to hospital discharge, to 30 days, and to 90 days; neurological performance; and incremental medical spending per additional survivor to 1 year.

Results: Survival to hospital discharge was greater among patients receiving BLS (13.1% vs 9.2% for ALS; 4.0 [95% CI, 2.3-5.7] percentage point difference), as was survival to 90 days (8.0% vs 5.4% for ALS; 2.6 [95% CI, 1.2-4.0] percentage point difference). Basic life support was associated with better neurological functioning among hospitalized patients (21.8% vs 44.8% with poor neurological functioning for ALS; 23.0 [95% CI, 18.6-27.4] percentage point difference). Incremental medical spending per additional survivor to 1 year for BLS relative to ALS was $154,333.

Conclusions and relevance: Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received BLS had higher survival at hospital discharge and at 90 days compared with those who received ALS and were less likely to experience poor neurological functioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Newhouse reported being a director of and holding equity in Aetna. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of Cardiac Arrest Sample Construction
Codes refer to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. ALS indicates advanced life support; BLS, basic life support. a Pickup locations included residence, scene of accident or acute event, skilled nursing facility, and non–skilled nursing facility residential, domiciliary, custodial, or nursing home facility. b Present on admission status for cardiac arrest is either no or unknown. c Rural areas are defined as counties that do not meet the metropolitan or micropolitan criteria as defined by the US Bureau of the Census. Metropolitan counties have at least 1 urbanized area of 50 000 or more population, and micropolitan counties have at least 1 urban cluster of at least 10 000 but less than 50 000 population. Both types have adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured by commuting ties.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Survival After Cardiac Arrest by Ambulance Service Level
The main plot shows survival probability during the first 90 days, and the inset shows survival probability over the full observational period. Survival analysis was based on cardiac arrests that occurred between January 1, 2009, and October 2, 2011. Mortality was observed until December 31, 2011, when the data were censored; thus, there was follow-up to at least 90 days for each beneficiary. ALS indicates advanced life support; BLS, basic life support.

Comment in

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association [published correction appears in Circulation. 2012;125(22):e1002] Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2–e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, et al. Public Access Defibrillation Trial Investigators Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):637–646. - PubMed
    1. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field BJ, III, et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II: Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. JAMA. 1999;281(13):1175–1181. - PubMed
    1. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):557–563. - PubMed
    1. Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):549–556. - PubMed

Publication types