Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Feb;59(2):864-71.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.03688-14. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Andrew F Shorr et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone with activity against a wide range of Gram-positive pathogens, was evaluated in two noninferiority phase 3 acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection trials. The data from individual trials showed its noninferior efficacy compared to that of linezolid and a favorable tolerability profile. To evaluate potential differences, the pooled data were analyzed. The patients received 200 mg of tedizolid once daily for 6 days or 600 mg of linezolid twice daily for 10 days. Efficacy was evaluated at 48 to 72 h (primary endpoint), on days 11 to 13 (end of therapy [EOT]), and 7 to 14 days after the EOT (posttherapy evaluation). Treatment-emergent adverse events and hematologic and clinical laboratory parameters were collected. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups: 852/1,333 (64%) patients were from North America, and the majority of infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid (early clinical responses, 81.6% versus 79.4%, respectively). The early responses remained relatively consistent across various host/disease factors and severity measures. Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse event (tedizolid, 8.2%; linezolid, 12.2%; P=0.02), with onset occurring primarily during the first 6 days. Fewer tedizolid than linezolid patients had platelet counts of <150,000 cells/mm3 at the EOT (tedizolid, 4.9%; linezolid, 10.8%; P=0.0003) and during the postbaseline period through the last day of active drug visit (tedizolid, 6.4%; linezolid, 12.6%; P=0.0016). Efficacy was achieved with a 6-day once-daily course of therapy with the option of an intravenous/oral regimen, and fewer low platelet counts and gastrointestinal side effects were reported with tedizolid than with linezolid, all of which aligns well with antimicrobial stewardship principles. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01170221 and NCT01421511.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram showing patient disposition for the pooled analysis of ESTABLISH-1 and ESTABLISH-2 phase 3 trials.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Differences in early clinical response between tedizolid and linezolid according to clinically relevant host and disease factors (A) and baseline severity measures (B) in the ITT population. The results are the weighted (by study) difference and adjusted confidence interval. [n/n], number of subjects in the subgroup in the tedizolid arm/number of subjects in the subgroup in the linezolid arm. BMI, body mass index; ITT, intent-to-treat; IV, intravenous; LZD, linezolid; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; TZD, tedizolid; WBC, white blood cell.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Patients with platelet counts below the lower limit of normal (LLN) (<150,000 cells/mm3) over time. *, P < 0.05. EOT, end-of-therapy.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Time to onset of gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events. *, P < 0.05.

References

    1. Taira BR, Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr, Lee CC. 2009. National epidemiology of cutaneous abscesses: 1996 to 2005. Am J Emerg Med 27:289–292. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hersh AL, Chambers HF, Maselli JH, Gonzales R. 2008. National trends in ambulatory visits and antibiotic prescribing for skin and soft-tissue infections. Arch Intern Med 168:1585–1591. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.14.1585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moran GJ, Abrahamian FM, Lovecchio F, Talan DA. 2013. Acute bacterial skin infections: developments since the 2005 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. J Emerg Med 44:e397–e412. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Everett ED, Dellinger P, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan EL, Montoya JG, Wade JC. 2005. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis 41:1373–1406. doi:10.1086/497143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tracy LA, Furuno JP, Harris AD, Singer M, Langenberg P, Roghmann MC. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus infections in US veterans, Maryland, USA, 1999–2008. Emerg Infect Dis 17:441–448. doi:10.3201/eid1703.100502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data