Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):83-9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9948. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy

Nicolas Wentzensen et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results are referred to colposcopy and biopsy for diagnosis of cervical cancer precursors (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]). Colposcopy with a single biopsy can miss identification of HSILs. No systematic study has quantified the improved detection of HSIL by taking multiple lesion-directed biopsies.

Methods: The Biopsy Study was an observational study of 690 women referred to colposcopy after abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Up to four directed biopsies were taken from distinct acetowhite lesions and ranked by colposcopic impression. A nondirected biopsy of a normal-appearing area was added if fewer than four directed biopsies were taken. HSIL identified by any biopsy was the reference standard of disease used to evaluate the incremental yield and sensitivity of multiple biopsies.

Results: In the overall population, sensitivities for detecting HSIL increased from 60.6% (95% CI, 54.8% to 66.6%) from a single biopsy to 85.6% (95% CI, 80.3% to 90.2%) after two biopsies and to 95.6% (95% CI, 91.3% to 99.2%) after three biopsies. A significant increase in sensitivity of multiple biopsies was observed in all subgroups. The highest increase in yield of HSIL was observed for women with a high-grade colposcopic impression, HSIL cytology, and human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 positivity. Only 2% of all HSILs diagnosed in the participants were detected by biopsies of normal-appearing transformation zone.

Conclusion: Collection of additional lesion-directed biopsies during colposcopy increased detection of histologic HSIL, regardless of patient characteristics. Taking additional biopsies when multiple lesions are present should become the standard practice of colposcopic biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Yield of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) by number of biopsies. Bars show the incremental yield of HSILs with increasing numbers of biopsies in women with one, two, three, and four biopsies. All biopsies were targeted at acetowhite or worse-appearing areas in the transformation zone. The gold bars show the incremental yield of each additional biopsy. The blue and gold bars combined show the total yield for the respective number of biopsies.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Sensitivity to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) with increasing numbers of biopsies. Blue bars indicate minimum estimate for sensitivity, with imputation based on the assumption that additional biopsies had the same yield as among women for whom four lesion-directed biopsies were performed. Blue plus gold bars indicate maximum estimate for sensitivity, with imputation based on the assumption that additional biopsies did not detect additional HSILs. Dashed line indicates intermediate estimate for sensitivity, assuming that additional biopsies had the same yield of HSILs as additional biopsies from normal-appearing sites in the transformation zone.

Comment in

References

    1. Davey DD, Neal MH, Wilbur DC, et al. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:1224–1229. - PubMed
    1. Wright TC, Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002;287:2120–2129. - PubMed
    1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:147–172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright TC, Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:346–355. - PubMed
    1. Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Castle PE, et al. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:833–840. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms