Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):58-64.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3296. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

SWOG S0221: a phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk early-stage breast cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

SWOG S0221: a phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk early-stage breast cancer

George T Budd et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Patients and methods: A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome.

Results: Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40).

Conclusion: Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor-negative/HER2-negative tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram for the original protocol of Southwest Oncology Group S0221 trial. AC, doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide; Q2 week, once every 2 weeks.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
(A) Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival plot for all randomly assigned patients by randomization arm. Number at risk at the beginning of each 12-month period is shown in the table. Three patients with no follow-up were excluded. (B) Kaplan-Meier overall survival plot of all randomly assigned patients by randomization arm. Three patients with no follow-up were excluded. (C) Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival plot by randomization arm for patients with triple-negative tumors (estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] negative). (D) Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival plot by randomization arm for patients with hormone receptor–positive (estrogen receptor–positive and progesterone receptor–positive) and HER2–negative tumors. 2wAC, doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks; AC + G, doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with filgrastim; q 2 weeks, once every 2 weeks.

References

    1. Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Huovinen R, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin for early breast cancer: Final analysis of the randomized FinXX trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;30:11–18. - PubMed
    1. Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2055–2065. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE, Jr, et al. Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: The NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3197–3204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1431–1439. - PubMed
    1. Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, et al. Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1663–1671. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding