Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb;22(2):137-47.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.00681-14. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis

Affiliations
Review

Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis

Muhammad G Morshed et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Complexities in the diagnosis of syphilis continue to challenge clinicians. While direct tests (e.g., microscopy or PCR) are helpful in early syphilis, the mainstay of diagnosis remains serologic tests. The traditional algorithm using a nontreponemal test (NTT) followed by a treponemal test (TT) remains the standard in many parts of the world. More recently, the ability to automate the TT has led to the increasingly widespread use of reverse algorithms using treponemal enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). Rapid, point-of-care TTs are in widespread use in developing countries because of low cost, ease of use, and reasonable performance. However, none of the current diagnostic algorithms are able to distinguish current from previously treated infections. In addition, the reversal of traditional syphilis algorithms has led to uncertainty in the clinical management of patients. The interpretation of syphilis tests is further complicated by the lack of a reliable gold standard for syphilis diagnostics, and the newer tests can result in false-positive reactions similar to those seen with older tests. Little progress has been made in the area of serologic diagnostics for congenital syphilis, which requires assessment of maternal treatment and serologic response as well as clinical and laboratory investigation of the neonate for appropriate management. The diagnosis of neurosyphilis continues to require the collection of cerebrospinal fluid for a combination of NTT and TT, and, while newer treponemal EIAs look promising, more studies are needed to confirm their utility. This article reviews current tests and discusses current controversies in syphilis diagnosis, with a focus on serologic tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Testing algorithms for syphilis diagnosis. (a) Traditional algorithm. (b) Reverse algorithm. (c) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) reverse algorithm. +, positive result; −, negative result; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; TP-PA or TPPA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; CIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay (36, 39, 48).
None
None

References

    1. Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. 1995. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:1–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seña AC, White BL, Sparling PF. 2010. Novel Treponema pallidum serologic tests: a paradigm shift in syphilis screening for the 21st century. Clin Infect Dis 51:700–708. doi:10.1086/655832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gayet-Ageron A, Lauterschlager S, Ninet B, Perneger TV, Combescure C. 2013. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of PCR in the diagnosis of syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 89:251–256. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2012-050622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norris SJ. 1993. Polypeptides of Treponema pallidum: progress toward understanding their structural, functional, and immunologic roles. Treponema pallidum Polypeptide Research Group. Microbiol Rev 57:750–779. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pope V, Norris SJ, Johnson RE. 2007. Treponema and other human host-associated spirochetes, p 987–1003. In Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed, vol 1 ASM Press, Washington, DC.