Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;21(4):309-318.

Optimizing Communication in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Affiliations

Optimizing Communication in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Vinciya Pandian et al. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2014.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the types of talking tracheostomy tubes available, present four case studies of critically ill patients who used a specialized tracheostomy tube to improve speech, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, propose patient selection criteria, and provide practical recommendations for medical care providers.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent tracheostomy in 2010.

Results: Of the 220 patients who received a tracheostomy in 2010, 164 (74.55%) received a percutaneous tracheostomy and 56 (25.45%) received an open tracheostomy. Among the percutaneous tracheostomy patients, speech-language pathologists were consulted on 113 patients, 74 of whom were on a ventilator. Four of these 74 patients received a talking tracheostomy tube, and all four were able to speak successfully while on the mechanical ventilator even though they were unable to tolerate cuff deflation.

Conclusions: Talking tracheostomy tubes allow patients who are unable to tolerate-cuff deflation to achieve phonation. Our experience with talking tracheostomy tubes suggests that clinicians should consider their use for patients who cannot tolerate cuff deflation.

Keywords: and quality of life; communication; mechanically ventilation; speech; talking tracheostomy tube.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Portex® Blue Line Ultra® Suctionaid (BLUSA) tracheostomy tube.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tracheostomy statistics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Use of voice prosteses in tracheotomized persons with or without ventilatory dependence. 1993 http://www.asha.org/policy. - PubMed
    1. Astrachan DI, Kirchner JC, Goodwin WJ., Jr Prolonged intubation vs. tracheotomy: Complications, practical and psychological considerations. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:1165–1169. - PubMed
    1. Batty S. Communication, swallowing and feeding in the intensive care unit patient. Nursing in Critical Care. 2009;14:175–179. - PubMed
    1. Coffman HM, Rees CJ, Sievers AE, Belafsky PC. Proximal suction tracheotomy tube reduces aspiration volume. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008;138:441–445. - PubMed
    1. Dezfulian C, Shojania K, Collard HR, Kim HM, Matthay MA, Saint S. Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Medicine. 2005;118:11–18. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources