Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD011298.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011298.pub2.

Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies

Affiliations

Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies

Laureen M Lopez et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Nearly two-thirds of women in their first postpartum year have an unmet need for family planning. Adolescents often have repeat pregnancies within a year of giving birth. Women may receive counseling on family planning both antepartum and postpartum. Decisions about contraceptive use made right after counseling may differ considerably from actual postpartum use. In earlier work, we found limited evidence of effectiveness from randomized trials on postpartum contraceptive counseling. For educational interventions, non-randomized studies may be conducted more often than randomized trials.

Objectives: We reviewed non-randomized studies of educational strategies to improve postpartum contraceptive use. Our intent was to examine associations between specific interventions and postpartum contraceptive use or subsequent pregnancy.

Search methods: We searched for eligible non-randomized studies until 3 November 2014. Sources included CENTRAL, PubMed, POPLINE, and Web of Science. We also sought current trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. For additional citations, we examined reference lists of relevant reports and reviews.

Selection criteria: The studies had to be comparative, i.e., have intervention and comparison groups. The educational component could be counseling or another behavioral strategy to improve contraceptive use among postpartum women. The intervention had to include contact within six weeks postpartum. The comparison condition could be another behavioral strategy to improve contraceptive use, usual care, other health education, or no intervention. Our primary outcomes were postpartum contraceptive use and subsequent pregnancy.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors evaluated abstracts for eligibility and extracted data from included studies. We computed the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous measures, both with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Where studies used adjusted analyses for continuous outcomes, we presented the results as reported by the investigators. Due to differences in interventions and outcome measures, we did not conduct meta-analysis. To assess the evidence quality, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

Main results: Six studies met our inclusion criteria and included a total of 5143 women. Of three studies with self-reported pregnancy data, two showed pregnancy to be less likely in the experimental group than in the comparison group (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.87) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.87). The interventions included a clinic-based counseling program and a community-based communication project.All studies showed some association of the intervention with contraceptive use. Two showed that treatment-group women were more likely to use a modern method than the control group: ORs were 1.77 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.89) and 3.08 (95% CI 2.36 to 4.02). In another study, treatment-group women were more likely than control-group women to use pills (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.50) or an intrauterine device (IUD) (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.27 to 10.86) but less likely to use and injectable method (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.00). One study used a score for method effectiveness. The methods of the special-intervention group scored higher than those of the comparison group at three months (MD 13.26, 95% CI 3.16 to 23.36). A study emphasizing IUDs showed women in the intervention group were more likely to use an IUD (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.69) and less likely to use no method (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.75). In another study, contraceptive use was more likely among women in a health service intervention compared to women in a community awareness program at four months (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.30) or women receiving standard care at 10 to 12 months (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.74). That study was the only one with a specific component on the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) that had sufficient data on LAM use. Women in the health service group were more likely than those in the community awareness group to use LAM (OR 41.36, 95% CI 10.11 to 169.20).

Authors' conclusions: We considered the quality of evidence to be very low. The studies had limitations in design, analysis, or reporting. Three did not adjust for potential confounding and only two had sufficient information on intervention fidelity. Outcomes were self reported and definitions varied for contraceptive use. All studies had adequate follow-up periods but most had high losses, as often occurs in contraception studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LM Lopez, TW Grey, M Chen, and JE Hiller: none

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Postpartum FP counseling plus LAM versus traditional FP counseling, Outcome 1 Pregnancy by 12 months.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Postpartum FP counseling plus LAM versus traditional FP counseling, Outcome 2 Use of specific modern methods at 12 months.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Postpartum FP counseling plus LAM versus traditional FP counseling, Outcome 3 No contraceptive use at 12 months.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Postpartum FP counseling plus LAM versus traditional FP counseling, Outcome 4 Use of traditional contraceptive methods at 12 months.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Family planning counseling versus control, Outcome 1 Contraceptive use (6 months postpartum).
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Family planning counseling versus control, Outcome 2 No contraceptive use (6 months postpartum).
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interactive education versus interactive pamphlet versus routine teaching, Outcome 1 Effectiveness of contraceptive method used most often (intervention versus pamphlet).
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interactive education versus interactive pamphlet versus routine teaching, Outcome 2 Effectiveness of contraceptive method used most often (intervention versus routine).
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interactive education versus interactive pamphlet versus routine teaching, Outcome 3 Sexual health knowledge at 2 months postpartum.
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interactive education versus interactive pamphlet versus routine teaching, Outcome 4 Sexual health attitudes at 2 months postpartum.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Family planning counseling and method provision versus no intervention, Outcome 1 Pregnancy at 6 months postpartum.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Family planning counseling and method provision versus no intervention, Outcome 2 IUD use postpartum.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 Family planning counseling and method provision versus no intervention, Outcome 3 Other method use postpartum.
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 Family planning counseling and method provision versus no intervention, Outcome 4 No contraceptive method use postpartum.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Birth‐spacing message models: health service (HSM) versus community awareness (CAM) versus standard care, Outcome 1 Contraceptive use postpartum (HSM versus standard care).
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 Birth‐spacing message models: health service (HSM) versus community awareness (CAM) versus standard care, Outcome 2 Contraceptive use postpartum (HSM versus CAM).
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 Birth‐spacing message models: health service (HSM) versus community awareness (CAM) versus standard care, Outcome 3 Use of LAM at 4 months postpartum.
5.4
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 Birth‐spacing message models: health service (HSM) versus community awareness (CAM) versus standard care, Outcome 4 Knowlege of effective LAM use at 4 months postpartum (HSM versus standard care).
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 Family planning communication program versus standard care, Outcome 1 Pregnancy at 9 months postpartum.
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 Family planning communication program versus standard care, Outcome 2 Use of modern contraceptive method at 9 months postpartum.
6.3
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6 Family planning communication program versus standard care, Outcome 3 Use of traditional contraceptive method at 9 months postpartum.
6.4
6.4. Analysis
Comparison 6 Family planning communication program versus standard care, Outcome 4 No contraceptive use at 9 months postpartum.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011298

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Abdel‐Tawab 2008 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Abdel‐Tawab N, Loza S, Zaki A. Helping Egyptian women achieve optimal birth spacing intervals through fostering linkages between family planning and maternal/child health services. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2008 Sep.
Foreit 1993 {published data only}
    1. Foreit KG, Foreit JR, Lagos G, Guzman A. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of postpartum IUD insertion in Lima, Peru. International Family Planning Perspectives 1993;19(1):19‐24.
    1. Guzman A, Lagos G, Herrera J, Foreit J. Immediate Post‐Partum and Post‐Abortion Family Planning Program. Final Report, Promoción de Labores Educativas y Asistenciales en Favor de la Salud (PROFAMILIA). Lima, Peru: Profamilia and Instituto Peruano del Seguro Social (IPSS) and The Population Council, 1990.
Hardy 1998 {published data only}
    1. Hardy E, Santos LC, Osis MJ, Carvalho G, Cecatti JG, Faúndes A. Contraceptive use and pregnancy before and after introducing lactational amenorrhea (LAM) in a postpartum program. Advances in Contraception 1998;14(1):59‐68. - PubMed
Lee 2011 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Lee JT, Tsai JL, Tsou TS, Chen MC. Effectiveness of a theory‐based postpartum sexual health education program on women's contraceptive use: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2011/06/15 2011; Vol. 84, issue 1:48‐56. - PubMed
Nacar 2003 {published data only}
    1. Nacar M, Ozturk A, Ozturk Y. [The effect of family planning education given during postpartum period on the use of contraceptive methods]. Erciyes Tip Dergisi 2003;25:122‐30.
Sebastian 2012 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Sebastian MP, Khan ME, Kumari K, Idani R. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India: evaluation of a community‐based behavior change communication intervention. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2012;38(2):68‐77. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Alvarado 1999 {published data only}
    1. Alvarado R, Zepeda A, Rivero S, Rico N, López S, Díaz, S. Integrated maternal and infant health care in the postpartum period in a poor neighborhood in Santiago, Chile. Studies in Family Planning 1999;30(2):133‐41. - PubMed
Brou 2009 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Brou H, Djohan G, Becquet R, Allou G, Ekouevi DK, Zanou B, et al. Sexual prevention of HIV within the couple after prenatal HIV‐testing in West Africa. AIDS Care. 2008/05/02 2008; Vol. 20, issue 4:413‐8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brou H, Viho I, Djohan G, Ekouevi D K, Zanou B, Leroy V, et al. Contraceptive use and incidence of pregnancy among women after HIV testing in Abidjan, Ivory Coast [Pratiques contraceptives et incidence des grossesses chez des femmes après un dépistage VIH à Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire]. Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique 2009;57(2):77‐86. - PubMed
Dhont 2009 {published data only}
    1. Dhont N, Ndayisaba GF, Peltier CA, Nzabonimpa A, Temmerman M, Wijgert J. Improved access increases postpartum uptake of contraceptive implants among HIV‐positive women in Rwanda. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 2009/11/26 2009; Vol. 14, issue 6:420‐5. - PubMed
Hale 2014 {published data only}
    1. Hale N, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington‐Kolb S. The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;210(1):50.e1‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.001] - DOI - PubMed
Hoke 2014 {published data only}
    1. Hoke T, Harries J, Crede S, Green M, Constant D, Petruney T, et al. Expanding contraceptive options for PMTCT clients: a mixed methods implementation study in Cape Town, South Africa. Reproductive Health 2014;11(1):3. [DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Johnson 2003 {published data only}
    1. Johnson LK, Edelman A, Jensen J. Patient satisfaction and the impact of written material about postpartum contraceptive decisions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;188(5):1202‐4. - PubMed
Kan 2012 {published data only}
    1. Kan ML, Ashley OS, LeTourneau KL, Williams JC, Jones SB, Hampton J, et al. The adolescent family life program: a multisite evaluation of federally funded projects serving pregnant and parenting adolescents. American Journal of Public Health 2012;102(10):1872‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Koniak‐Griffin 1999 {published data only}
    1. Koniak‐Griffin D, Mathenge C, Anderson NL, Verzemnieks I. An early intervention program for adolescent mothers: a nursing demonstration project. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 1999;28(1):51‐9. - PubMed
Lee 2007 {published data only}
    1. Lee JT Yen HW. Randomized controlled evaluation of a theory‐based postpartum sexual health education programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007;60(4):389‐401. - PubMed
Núñez Rocha 2005 {published data only}
    1. Núñez Rocha GM, Alanís Alanís MJ, Alanís Salazar J, Salinas Martínez AM, Garza Elizondo ME, Villarreal Ríos E. Differences in the use of family planning methods by adolescent females according to the education model utilized during pregnancy. Monterrey, Mexico [Diferencias en la utilizacion de metodos de planificacion familiar por mujeres adolescentes en Monterrey, Mexico, segujn el modelo de educacion sanitaria utilizado]. Revista Española de Salud Pública 2005;79(1):69‐77. - PubMed
Patchen 2013 {published data only}
    1. Patchen L, Letourneau K, Berggren E. Evaluation of an integrated services program to prevent subsequent pregnancy and birth among urban teen mothers. Social Work in Health Care 2013;52(7):642‐55. - PubMed
Planned Parenthood 2013 {published data only}
    1. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. Investigating the Effect of a Prenatal Family Planning Counseling Intervention Led by Community Health Workers on Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Women in the West Bank. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01854671 (accessed 21 April 2014).
Sangalang 2006 {published data only}
    1. Sangalang BB, Barth RP, Painter JS. First‐birth outcomes and timing of second births: a statewide case management program for adolescent mothers. Health & Social Work 2006;31(1):54‐63. - PubMed
Sayegh 1976 {published data only}
    1. Sayegh J, Mosley WH. The effectiveness of family planning education on acceptance of contraception by postpartum mothers. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 1976;139(Suppl):31‐7. - PubMed
Temmerman 1990 {published data only}
    1. Temmerman M, Moses S, Kiragu D, Fusallah S. Impact of single session post‐partum counselling of HIV infected women on their subsequent reproductive behaviour. AIDS Care. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 1990; Vol. 2, issue 3:247‐52. - PubMed
    1. Temmerman M, Plummer FA, Mirza NB, Ndinya‐Achola JO, Wamola IA, Nagelkerke N, et al. Infection with HIV as a risk factor for adverse obstetrical outcome. AIDS. 1990/11/01 1990; Vol. 4, issue 11:1087‐93. - PubMed
Tocce 2012 {published data only}
    1. Tocce KM, Sheeder JL, Teal SB. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012;206(6):481.e1‐7. - PubMed
Vikhlyaeva 2001 {published data only}
    1. Vikhlyaeva E, Nikolaeva E, Brandrup‐Lukanow A. Contraceptive use and family planning after labor in the European part of the Russian Federation: 2‐year monitoring. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2001;6(4):219‐26. - PubMed
Warren 2012 {published data only}
    1. Warren CE, Abuya T, Askew I. Family planning practices and pregnancy intentions among HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative postpartum women in Swaziland: a cross sectional survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2013;13(15 Jul):150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren CE, Mayhew SH, Vassall A, Kimani JK, Church K, Obure CD. Study protocol for the Integra Initiative to assess the benefits and costs of integrating sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Kenya and Swaziland. BMC Public Health 2012;12(Nov 13):973. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Baldwin 2013
    1. Baldwin MK, Edelman AB. The effect of long‐acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: a review. Journal of Adolescent Health 2013;52(4 Suppl):S47‐53. - PubMed
Balshem 2011
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):401‐6. - PubMed
Borda 2010
    1. Borda MR, Winfrey W, McKaig C. Return to sexual activity and modern family planning use in the extended postpartum period: an analysis of findings from seventeen countries. African Journal of Reproductive Health 2010;14(4):72‐9. - PubMed
Borrelli 2011
    1. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 2011;71(s1):S52‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Chapman 2012
    1. Chapman S, Jafa K, Longfield K, Vielot N, Buszin J, Ngamkitpaiboon L, et al. Condom social marketing in sub‐Saharan Africa and the Total Market Approach. Sexual Health 2012;9(1):44‐50. - PubMed
Do 2013
    1. Do M, Hotchkiss D. Relationships between antenatal and postnatal care and post‐partum modern contraceptive use: evidence from population surveys in Kenya and Zambia. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:6. - PMC - PubMed
Engin‐Üstün 2007
    1. Engin‐Üstün Y, Üstün Y, Cetin F, Meydanh MM, Kafkasli A, Sezgin B. Effect of postpartum counseling on postpartum contraceptive use. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2007;275(6):429‐32. - PubMed
Glazer 2011
    1. Glazer AB, Wolf A, Gorby N. Postpartum contraception: needs vs. reality. Contraception 2011;83(3):238‐41. - PubMed
Guyatt 2011
    1. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction‐GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):383‐94. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Lathrop 2011
    1. Lathrop E, Telemaque Y, Goedken P, Andes K, Jamieson DJ, Cwiak C. Postpartum contraceptive needs in northern Haiti. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2011;112(3):239‐42. - PubMed
Lopez 2012
    1. Lopez LM, Hiller JE, Grimes DA, Chen M. Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Mosher 2012
    1. Mosher WD, Jones J, Abma JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982‐2010. National Center for Health Statistics reports; no 55. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2012. - PubMed
Ndugwa 2011
    1. Ndugwa RP, Cleland J, Madise NJ, Fotso JC, Zulu EM. Menstrual pattern, sexual behaviors, and contraceptive use among postpartum women in Nairobi urban slums. Journal of Urban Health 2011;88(Suppl 2):S341‐55. - PMC - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Thurman 2007
    1. Thurman AR, Hammond N, Brown HE, Roddy ME. Preventing repeat teen pregnancy: postpartum depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptive pills, or the patch?. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 2007;20(2):61‐5. - PubMed
Thurman 2011
    1. Thurman AR, Clark MR, Doncel GF. Multipurpose prevention technologies: biomedical tools to prevent HIV‐1, HSV‐2, and unintended pregnancies. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; Vol. Aug 9, issue Epub:1‐10. [DOI: 10.1155/2011/429403] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Trussell 2011
    1. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397‐404. - PMC - PubMed
USAID 2014
    1. United States Agency for International Development. Postpartum Family Planning (PPFP) Toolkit. www.k4health.org/toolkits/ppfp (accessed 8 September 2014).
Wells 2013
    1. GA Wells, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta‐analyses. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed 26 March 2013).
Westhoff 2012
    1. Westhoff CF. Unmet Need for Modern Contraceptive Methods. DHS Analytical Studies No. 28. Princeton (NJ): Office of Population Research, Princeton University; 2012 Sep.
WHO 2013
    1. World Health Organization. Family planning. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/ (accessed 14 April 2014).
Wilson 2011
    1. Wilson EK, Samandari G, Koo HP, Tucker C. Adolescent mothers' postpartum contraceptive use: a qualitative study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2011;43(4):230‐7. - PubMed
Yee 2011
    1. Yee LM, Simon MA. Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low‐income minority women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2011;22(4):1387‐400. - PubMed

Publication types