Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;71(5):975-90.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12577. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

Is there an economic case for investing in nursing care--what does the literature tell us?

Affiliations

Is there an economic case for investing in nursing care--what does the literature tell us?

Diane E Twigg et al. J Adv Nurs. 2015 May.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the cost effectiveness of increasing nurse staffing or changing the nursing skill mix in adult medical and/or surgical patients?

Background: Research has demonstrated that nurse staffing levels and skill mix are associated with patient outcomes in acute care settings. If increased nurse staffing levels or richer skill mix can be shown to be cost-effective hospitals may be more likely to consider these aspects when making staffing decisions.

Design: A systematic review of the literature on economic evaluations of nurse staffing and patient outcomes was conducted to see whether there is consensus that increasing nursing hours/skill mix is a cost-effective way of improving patient outcomes. We used the Cochrane Collaboration systematic review method incorporating economic evidence.

Data sources: The MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and PsychINFO databases were searched in 2013 for published and unpublished studies in English with no date limits.

Review methods: The review focused on full economic evaluations where costs of increasing nursing hours or changing the skill mix were included and where consequences included nursing sensitive outcomes.

Results: Four-cost benefit and five-cost effectiveness analyses were identified. There were no cost-minimization or cost-utility studies identified in the review. A variety of methods to conceptualize and measure costs and consequences were used across the studies making it difficult to compare results.

Conclusion: This review was unable to determine conclusively whether or not changes in nurse staffing levels and/or skill mix is a cost-effective intervention for improving patient outcomes due to the small number of studies, the mixed results and the inability to compare results across studies.

Keywords: acute care; economic evaluation; literature review; nurse sensitive outcomes; nurse skill mix; nurse staffing; nursing; patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J. Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288:1987–1993. &. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM. Silber JH. Education levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;290:1617–1623. &. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Griffiths P, Busse R, Diomidous M, Kinnunen J, Kozka M, Lessafre E, McHugh MD, Moreno-Casbas MT, Rafferty AM, Schwendimann R, Scott PA, Tishelman C, van Achterberg T. Sermeus W. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. The Lancet. 2014;383:1–7. &. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behner KG, Fogg LF, Fournier LC, Frankenbach JT. Robertson SB. Nursing resource management: analysing the relationship between costs and quality in staffing decisions. Health Care Management Review. 1990;15:63–71. &. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199001540-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada. 3rd edn. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health; 2006.

Publication types