Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 27;15(1):79.
doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-79.

Refractory chronic cluster headache: a consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation

Affiliations

Refractory chronic cluster headache: a consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation

Dimos D Mitsikostas et al. J Headache Pain. .

Abstract

Chronic cluster headache (CCH) often resists to prophylactic pharmaceutical treatments resulting in patients' life damage. In this rare but pragmatic situation escalation to invasive management is needed but framing criteria are lacking. We aimed to reach a consensus for refractory CCH definition for clinical and research use. The preparation of the final consensus followed three stages. Internal between authors, a larger between all European Headache Federation members and finally an international one among all investigators that have published clinical studies on cluster headache the last five years. Eighty-five investigators reached by email. Proposed criteria were in the format of the International Classification of Headache Disorders III-beta (description, criteria, notes, comments and references). Following this evaluation eight drafts were prepared before the final. Twenty-four (28.2%) international investigators commented during two rounds. Refractory CCH is described in the present consensus as a situation that fulfills the criteria of ICHD-3 beta for CCH with at least three severe attacks per week despite at least three consecutive trials of adequate preventive treatments. The condition is rare, but difficult to manage and invasive treatments may be needed. The consensus addresses five specific clinical and paraclinical diagnostic criteria followed by three notes and specific comments. Although refractory CCH may be not a separate identity these specific diagnostic criteria should help clinicians and investigators to improve patient's quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodology used for the preparation and evaluation of criteria.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. - PubMed
    1. Fischera M, Marziniak M, Gralow I, Evers S. The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:614–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01592.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell MB. Epidemiology and genetics of cluster headache. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:279–283. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00735-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manzoni GC, Micieli G, Granella F, Tassorelli C, Zanferrari C, Cavallini A. Cluster headache-course over ten years in 189 patients. Cephalalgia. 1991;11:169–174. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1991.1104169.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Kleef M, Lataster A, Narouze S, Mekhail N, Geurts JW, Van Zundert J. Evidence-based interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses, 2: cluster headache. Pain Pract. 2009;9:435–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00331.x. - DOI - PubMed