Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
- PMID: 25431092
- PMCID: PMC4280766
- DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-158
Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
Abstract
Background: Accurate assessments of adherence and exercise performance are required in order to ensure that patients adhere to and perform their rehabilitation exercises correctly within the home environment. Inertial sensors have previously been advocated as a means of achieving these requirements, by using them as an input to an exercise biofeedback system. This research sought to investigate whether inertial sensors, and in particular a single sensor, can accurately classify exercise performance in patients performing lower limb exercises for rehabilitation purposes.
Methods: Fifty-eight participants (19 male, 39 female, age: 53.9 ± 8.5 years, height: 1.69 ± 0.08 m, weight: 74.3 ± 13.0 kg) performed ten repetitions of seven lower limb exercises (hip abduction, hip flexion, hip extension, knee extension, heel slide, straight leg raise, and inner range quadriceps). Three inertial sensor units, secured to the thigh, shin and foot of the leg being exercised, were used to acquire data during each exercise. Machine learning classification methods were applied to quantify the acquired data.
Results: The classification methods achieved relatively high accuracy at distinguishing between correct and incorrect performance of an exercise using three, two, or one sensor while moderate efficacy scores were also achieved by the classifier when attempting to classify the particular error in exercise performance. Results also illustrated that a reduction in the number of inertial sensor units employed has little effect on the overall efficacy results.
Conclusion: The results revealed that it is possible to classify lower limb exercise performance using inertial sensors with satisfactory levels of accuracy and reducing the number of sensors employed does not reduce the accuracy of the method.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Adherence monitoring of rehabilitation exercise with inertial sensors: A clinical validation study.Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 16. Gait Posture. 2019. PMID: 30903993
-
Verification of a Portable Motion Tracking System for Remote Management of Physical Rehabilitation of the Knee.Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 28;19(5):1021. doi: 10.3390/s19051021. Sensors (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30823373 Free PMC article.
-
Technology in Rehabilitation: Evaluating the Single Leg Squat Exercise with Wearable Inertial Measurement Units.Methods Inf Med. 2017 Mar 23;56(2):88-94. doi: 10.3414/ME16-02-0002. Epub 2016 Oct 26. Methods Inf Med. 2017. PMID: 27782290 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of inertial sensors for the classification of rehabilitation exercises.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2965-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944245. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014. PMID: 25570613 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises.Comput Biol Med. 2020 Apr;119:103687. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103687. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Comput Biol Med. 2020. PMID: 32339122 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Role and Importance of Using Sensor-Based Devices in Medical Rehabilitation: A Literature Review on the New Therapeutic Approaches.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 3;23(21):8950. doi: 10.3390/s23218950. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37960649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback for Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods User Evaluation of a Prototype System.Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 21;19(2):432. doi: 10.3390/s19020432. Sensors (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30669657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Quantitative assessment of cerebellar ataxia, through automated limb functional tests.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Feb 27;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0490-3. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 30813963 Free PMC article.
-
Fifteen Years of Wireless Sensors for Balance Assessment in Neurological Disorders.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 7;20(11):3247. doi: 10.3390/s20113247. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32517315 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A novel Dynamic Body Weight Support overground co-walker enabling variable unloading ratio and Motion Tracking.Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 8;17:1188776. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1188776. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37360168 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JWJ, Dieppe P, Gunther K, Hauselmann H, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis K, Lohmander S, Leeb B, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Pendleton A, Punzi L, Serni U, Swoboda B, Verbruggen G, Zimmerman-Gorska I, Dougados M. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT) Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:1145–1155. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011742. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Friedrich M, Cermak T, Maderbacher P. The effect of brochure use versus therapist teaching on patients performing therapeutic exercise and on changes in impairment status. Phys Ther. 1996;76(10):1082–1088. - PubMed
-
- Bassett S. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. New Zeal J Physiother. 2003;31(2):60–66.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical