Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Oct;18(15):2742-9.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002730. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

The effect of changes in visibility and price on fruit purchasing at a university cafeteria in Lima, Peru

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of changes in visibility and price on fruit purchasing at a university cafeteria in Lima, Peru

María Kathia Cárdenas et al. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of increasing fruit visibility, adding information and lowering price on fruit purchasing at a university cafeteria in Lima, Peru.

Design: Quasi-experimental pilot study of a three-phase stepped intervention. In Phase 1, fruit was displayed >3 m from the point of purchase with no additional information. Phase 2 consisted in displaying the fruit near the point of purchase with added health and price information. Phase 3 added a 33% price reduction. The duration of each phase was 3 weeks and phases were separated by 2-week breaks. Primary outcomes were total pieces of fruit and number of meals sold daily.

Setting: A university cafeteria in Lima, Peru.

Subjects: Approximately 150 people, students and non-student adults, who purchased food daily. Twelve students participated in post-intervention interviews.

Results: Fruit purchasing doubled from Phase 1 to Phase 3 (P<0·01) and remained significant after adjusting for the number of meals sold daily (P<0·05). There was no evidence of a difference in fruit sold between the other phases. Females purchased 100% of the fruit in Phase 1, 82% in Phase 2 and 67% in Phase 3 (P<0·01). Males increased their purchasing significantly between Phase 1 and 3 (P<0·01). Non-student adults purchased more fruit with each phase (P<0·05) whereas students did not. Qualitatively, the most common reason for not purchasing fruit was a marked preference to buy unhealthy snack foods.

Conclusions: Promoting fruit consumption by product placement close to the point of purchase, adding health information and price reduction had a positive effect on fruit purchasing in a university cafeteria, especially in males and non-student adults.

Keywords: Food accessibility; Fruit; Health promotion; Price.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(colour online) Fruit location in Phase 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(colour online) Fruit location near the point of purchase in Phase 2 and Phase 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(colour online) Message in the covered container and on posters in (a) Phase 2 and (b) Phase 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Total number of meals sold daily (——) and total pieces of whole fruit sold daily (formula image) over time during the three-phase stepped intervention on fruit purchasing in a university cafeteria, Lima, Peru
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Total fruit purchased overall, by sex and by age group in each experimental phase (formula image, Phase 1; formula image, Phase 2; formula image, Phase 3) during the three-phase stepped intervention on fruit purchasing in a university cafeteria, Lima, Peru

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hartley L, Igbinedion E, Holmes J et al.. (2013) Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6, CD009874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ness AR & Powles JW (1997) Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int J Epidemiol 26, 1–13. - PubMed
    1. Bazzano LA (2005) Dietary Intake of Fruit and Vegetables and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Diseases. Background Paper for the Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan. Geneva: WHO.
    1. Riboli E & Norat T (2003) Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 78, Suppl. 3, 559S–569S. - PubMed
    1. Rees K, Dyakova M, Wilson N et al.. (2013) Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12, CD002128. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources