Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cisplatin, VP-16 and radiation therapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group Study
- PMID: 2543513
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00263134
Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cisplatin, VP-16 and radiation therapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group Study
Abstract
Patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer were given induction chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cisplatin, and etoposide (COPE) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Responding patients then received chest and elective whole-brain irradiation. Patients presenting with brain metastases received therapeutic brain irradiation during the first cycle of chemotherapy. No maintenance therapy was given, but two late intensification cycles of COPE were given at weeks 24 and 48. Among the 34 evaluable patients, the response rate to induction chemotherapy was 59%, with 10% achieving a complete response (CR) and 49%, a partial response (PR). Of the 18 patients who completed chest irradiation, 3 achieved a CR, producing an overall CR rate of 18%. Five patients completed the projected course of treatment. The median duration of response for all patients was 8 months (range, 2-30+ months) and the median survival was 9 months (range, 1-30+ months). Complete responders had a median response duration of 9 months and a median survival of 11 months. This regimen produced significant myelosuppression, with 5 neutropenic deaths (13%) occurring in the 38 patients evaluable for toxicity; an additional 16% required hospitalization for fever while neutropenic. Only six patients (13%) had nadir platelet counts of less than 50,000/mm3 with no episodes of thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. Nausea, vomiting, and neurotoxicity were mild to moderate in all patients. One patient with no evidence of disease died of radiation pneumonitis at 6 months. While producing significant toxicity, this regimen did not result in a CR rate or survival advantage that would suggest its superiority over standard regimens for small-cell lung cancer.
Similar articles
-
Concurrent cisplatin, prolonged oral etoposide, and vincristine plus chest and brain irradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG-9229).Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Mar 15;40(5):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00003-0. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998. PMID: 9539558 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined-modality treatment of small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison of three induction chemotherapies followed by maintenance chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy to the chest. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).Ann Oncol. 1994 Dec;5(10):921-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058731. Ann Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7696164 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of limited small-cell lung cancer with etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide and chest radiotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.J Clin Oncol. 1990 Jan;8(1):39-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.1.39. J Clin Oncol. 1990. PMID: 2153194 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1986 Sep;13(3 Suppl 3):10-6. Semin Oncol. 1986. PMID: 3020692 Review.
-
Adult medulloblastoma: multiagent chemotherapy.Neuro Oncol. 2001 Jan;3(1):29-34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/3.1.29. Neuro Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11305414 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials