Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;135(2):162-8.
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.968803. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Endonasal flap suture-dacryocystorhinostomy (eFS-DCR): a new surgical technique for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)

Affiliations

Endonasal flap suture-dacryocystorhinostomy (eFS-DCR): a new surgical technique for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)

Hirohiko Tachino et al. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Conclusion: Endonasal flap suture-dacryocystorhinostomy (eFS- DCR) is a new and valuable technique for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). This technique could improve the success rate of endonasal DCR in comparison to external DCR.

Objective: The standard procedure for NLDO is DCR. DCR can be performed via either an external or endonasal approach. External DCR is now regarded as the gold standard in the treatment of NLDO because of its higher success rate. However, we report a new endonasal surgical technique, eFS-DCR, and assess its efficacy by comparison with the standard endonasal DCR.

Methods: We prospectively investigated a series of 62 consecutive patients with NLDO undergoing endonasal DCR. There were two surgical intervention groups: group 1 (24 patients, 28 sites) undergoing endonasal DCR without eFS; and group 2 (38 patients, 47 sites) undergoing eFS-DCR. Study end points were success rate, the ostium diameter (OD) of the lacrimal sac after DCR, and the duration of stent placement. We compared the two groups on these three points.

Results: The success rate was 78.6% (22 of 28 sites) for group 1 (DCR without eFS) and 97.9% (46 of 47 sites) for group 2 (eFS-DCR). The ostium size in patients in group 2 was larger than that in group 1. The median time for the duration of stent placement was 42.5 days for group 1 and 31.5 days for group 2. There was a statistical difference (p < 0.01) in all these parameters between the two groups.

Keywords: Lacrimal sac; Nunchaku-style silicone tubes; knot pusher; needle holder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources