Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e93456.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093456. eCollection 2014.

Does ownership matter? An overview of systematic reviews of the performance of private for-profit, private not-for-profit and public healthcare providers

Cristian A Herrera  1 , Gabriel Rada  2 , Lucy Kuhn-Barrientos  3 , Ximena Barrios  1
Affiliations
Review

Does ownership matter? An overview of systematic reviews of the performance of private for-profit, private not-for-profit and public healthcare providers

Cristian A Herrera et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Ownership of healthcare providers has been considered as one factor that might influence their health and healthcare related performance. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of what is known about the effects on economic, administrative and health related outcomes of different types of ownership of healthcare providers--namely public, private non-for-profit (PNFP) and private for-profit (PFP)--based on the findings of systematic reviews (SR).

Methods and findings: An overview of systematic reviews was performed. Different databases were searched in order to select SRs according to an explicit comprehensive criterion. Included SRs were assessed to determine their methodological quality. Of the 5918 references reviewed, fifteen SR were included, but six of them were rated as having major limitations, so they weren't incorporated in the analyses. According to the nine analyzed SR, ownership does seem to have an effect on health and healthcare related outcomes. In the comparison of PFP and PNFP providers, significant differences in terms of mortality of patients and payments to facilities have been found, both being higher in PFP facilities. In terms of quality and economic indicators such as efficiency, there are no concluding results. When comparing PNFP and public providers, as well as for PFP and public providers, no clear differences were found.

Conclusion: PFP providers seem to have worst results than their PNFP counterparts, but there are still important evidence gaps in the literature that needs to be covered, including the comparison between public and both PFP and PNFP providers. More research is needed in low and middle income countries to understand the impact on and development of healthcare delivery systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Search strategy results and description of studies selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gray BH (1986) For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
    1. Comondore VR, Devereaux PJ, Zhou Q, Stone SB, Busse JW, et al. (2009) Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. Aug 4 339:b2732 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2732 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frank AS (2000) Chapter 21: Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior, . In Handbook of Health Economics, Elsevier Anthony J, Culyer, and Joseph P, Newhouse, Editor(s). Volume 1 Part B, Pages 1141–1174.
    1. Rosenthal G, Newbrander W (1996) Public policy and private sector provision of health services. Int J Health Plann Manage 11:203–216. - PubMed
    1. Jaspen B (1998) Entrepreneur's Dream: Healthcare Venture Capital Funding Keeps Record Pace. Modern Healthcare 28(10):40. - PubMed

MeSH terms