Impact of contact precautions on falls, pressure ulcers and transmission of MRSA and VRE in hospitalized patients
- PMID: 25441487
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.09.003
Impact of contact precautions on falls, pressure ulcers and transmission of MRSA and VRE in hospitalized patients
Abstract
Background: Hospitals use contact precautions to prevent the spread of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). There is concern that contact precautions may have adverse effects on the safety of isolated patients. In November 2010, the infection control policy at an academic medical centre was modified, and contact precautions were discontinued for patients colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE (MRSA/VRE patients).
Aim: To assess the rates of falls and pressure ulcers among MRSA/VRE patients and other adult medical-surgical patients, as well as changes in MRSA and VRE transmission before and after the policy change.
Methods: A single-centre retrospective hospital-wide cohort study was performed from 1st November 2009 to 31st October 2011.
Findings: Rates of falls and pressure ulcers were significantly higher among MRSA/VRE patients compared with other adult medical-surgical patients before the policy change (falls: 4.57 vs 2.04 per 1000 patient-days, P < 0.0001; pressure ulcers: 4.87 vs 1.22 per 1000 patient-days, P < 0.0001) and after the policy change (falls: 4.82 vs 2.10 per 1000 patient-days, P < 0.0001; pressure ulcers: 4.17 vs 1.19 per 1000 patient-days, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in the rates of falls and pressure ulcers among MRSA/VRE patients were found after the policy change compared with before the policy change. There was no overall change in MRSA or VRE hospital-acquired transmission.
Conclusion: MRSA/VRE patients had higher rates of falls and pressure ulcers compared with other adult medical-surgical patients. Rates were not affected by removal of contact precautions, suggesting that other factors contribute to these complications. Further research is required among this population to prevent complications.
Similar articles
-
The discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: Impact upon patient adverse events and hospital operations.BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008926. Epub 2019 Jul 18. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020. PMID: 31320496
-
Noninfectious Hospital Adverse Events Decline After Elimination of Contact Precautions for MRSA and VRE.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):788-796. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.93. Epub 2018 May 10. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29745356 Free PMC article.
-
Can we reduce contact precautions days for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus infected patients?J Infect Public Health. 2020 Aug;13(8):1118-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 23. J Infect Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32336607
-
[Hospital infection control measures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci].Nihon Rinsho. 2002 Nov;60(11):2144-9. Nihon Rinsho. 2002. PMID: 12440120 Review. Japanese.
-
Does the removal of contact precautions for MRSA and VRE infected patients change health care-associated infection rate?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Am J Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 33276000
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Patients' Adverse Events During Contact Isolation for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Using a Matched Cohort Study With Propensity Score.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221865. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1865. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35267031 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of COVID-19 on Levels of Adherence to the Completion of Nursing Records for Inpatients in Isolation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111262. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34769780 Free PMC article.
-
Mathematical modelling of vancomycin-resistant enterococci transmission during passive surveillance and active surveillance with contact isolation highlights the need to identify and address the source of acquisition.BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3388-y. BMC Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30309313 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of isolation on hospitalised patients who are infectious: systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e030371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030371. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32075820 Free PMC article.
-
Gloves, gowns and masks for reducing the transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital setting.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;2015(7):CD007087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26184396 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical