Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Dec;98(6):1914-20; discussion 1920-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Differential outcomes with early and late repeat transplantation in the era of the lung allocation score

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differential outcomes with early and late repeat transplantation in the era of the lung allocation score

Asishana A Osho et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Rates of repeat lung transplantation have increased since implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS). The purpose of this study is to compare survival between repeat (ReTx) and primary (LTx) lung transplant recipients in the LAS era.

Methods: We extracted data from 9,270 LTx and 456 ReTx recipients since LAS implementation, from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Propensity scoring was used to match ReTx and LTx recipients. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival between LTx and ReTx groups, with and without stratification based on time between first and second transplant. Multivariable Cox models estimated predictors of survival in lung recipients.

Results: Comparing all ReTx to LTx demonstrates a survival advantage for LTx that is diminished with propensity score matching (p = 0.174). Considering LTx against ReTx greater than 90 days after the initial procedure, there are similar survival results (p < 0.067). In contrast, ReTx within 90 days was associated with a survival disadvantage that persisted despite matching (p = 0.011). In ReTx populations, factors conferring worse outcomes include intensive care unit admission, unilateral transplantation, poor functional status, and primary graft dysfunction as the indication for retransplantation (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Late lung retransplantation appears to be as beneficial as primary transplantation in propensity-matched patients. However, survival is severely diminished in those retransplanted less than 90 days after primary transplantation. The utility of early retransplantation needs to be carefully weighed in light of risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Number and proportion of lung retransplantation performed in the United States by year (LAS = lung allocation score)
Fig 2
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing (A) unmatched and (B) matched groups of primary and repeat lung recipients
Fig 3
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing survival in (A) Early (< 90 days) and (B) late (≥ 90 days) retransplantation with survival in unmatched and matched groups of primary lung recipients
Fig 4
Fig 4. Survival by time between initial and repeat transplantation
Fig 5
Fig 5. Comparative survival of lung retransplantation before and after the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS)

References

    1. Kawut SM. Lung retransplantation. Clin Chest Med. 2011;32:367–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawut SM, Lederer DJ, Keshavjee S, et al. Outcomes after lung retransplantation in the modern era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:114–20. - PubMed
    1. Tsuang WM, Vock DM, Finlen Copeland CA, Lederer DJ, Palmer SM. An acute change in lung allocation score and survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:650–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minami M, Okumura M. Lung retransplantation; cadaveric lung retransplantation. [Article in Japanese] Kyobu Geka. 2013;66(8 Suppl):727–31. - PubMed
    1. Kilic A, Beaty CA, Merlo CA, Conte JV, Shah AS. Functional status is highly predictive of outcomes after redo lung transplantation: an analysis of 390 cases in the modern era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1804–11. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms