Validation of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and development of a prognostic model
- PMID: 25443275
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.08.011
Validation of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and development of a prognostic model
Abstract
Objective: To validate the biological and prognostic value of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 (TGP5) in patients with Gleason score 7 (GS 7) prostate cancer (PCa) and to develop a prognostic model to identify the high-risk group of patients with TGP5.
Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 4,146 patients with localized (pT2-3 N0 M0) GS 7 PCa treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) without adjuvant therapy. The primary end point was biochemical recurrence (BCR), and the secondary one was to build a bootstrap-corrected multivariable Cox model.
Results: Of the 4,146 patients, 416 (10%) had a TPG5 in the RP specimen. TGP5 was associated with BCR in both univariable and multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of standard pathological features (P<0.001). A prognostic model based on preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels (<10 vs.≥10ng/ml), primary and secondary Gleason pattern (3+4 vs. 4+3), pathological tumor category (pT2/pT3a vs. pT3b), and surgical margin status (R0 vs. R+) stratified patients with a discrimination of 72.2%. Patients in the low-risk group had a 5-year BCR-free survival rate of 76.3% compared with only 18.5% for those in the high-risk group (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Knowledge of TGP5 improves our prognostication of patients with GS 7 PCa treated with RP. We developed a statistical tool to help identify the patients with TGP5 who are at the highest risk of BCR after RP, thereby helping with the clinical decision making regarding adjuvant trials and follow-up scheduling.
Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Gleason 7; Prostate cancer; Risk-stratification model; Tertiary Gleason pattern 5.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer: Effects of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on oncological outcome.Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):188-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.370. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Nat Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 25600096 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The prognostic role of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in a contemporary grading system for prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):93-98. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.55. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017. PMID: 27845330
-
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 22487441
-
Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):158.e1-158.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Urol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29288003
-
Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):271-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11317.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 22757970 Review.
-
Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Oct 17. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23092544 Review.
Cited by
-
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Volumetric Morphology of PET-Positive Lymph Nodes Stratified by Tumor Differentiation of Prostate Cancer.J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1949-1955. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185033. Epub 2017 Jun 21. J Nucl Med. 2017. PMID: 28637799 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Gleason pattern 5 including tertiary pattern 5 on outcomes of salvage treatment for biochemical recurrence in pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer.Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;21(5):975-980. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0978-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27098807
-
Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.BMC Cancer. 2020 May 1;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06880-8. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32357849 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians.Asian J Androl. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_24_17. Online ahead of print. Asian J Androl. 2017. PMID: 28782737 Free PMC article.
-
Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Mar;17(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0576-4. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 26874537 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical