Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;156(5):1261-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Axillary reverse mapping: five-year experience

Affiliations

Axillary reverse mapping: five-year experience

Daniela Ochoa et al. Surgery. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: We hypothesize that mapping the lymphatic drainage of the arm with blue dye (axillary reverse mapping [ARM]) during axillary lymphadenectomy decreases the likelihood of disruption of lymphatics and subsequent lymphedema.

Methods: This institutional review board-approved study involved 360 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from May 2006 to October 2011. Technetium sulfur colloid (4 mL) was injected subareolarly, and 5 mL of blue dye was injected subcutaneously in the volar surface ipsilateral upper extremity (ARM). Data were collected on variations in lymphatic drainage, successful identification and protection of arm lymphatics, crossover, and occurrence of lymphedema.

Results: A group of 360 patients underwent SLNB and/or ALND, 348 of whom underwent a SLNB. Of those, 237 (68.1%) had a SLNB only, and 111 (31.9%) went on to an ALND owing to a positive axilla. An additional 12 of 360 (3.3%) axilla had ALND owing to a clinically positive axilla/preoperative core needle biopsy. In 96% of patients with SLNB (334/348), breast SLNs were hot but not blue; crossover (SLN hot and blue) was seen in 14 of 348 patients (4%). Blue lymphatics were identified in 80 of 237 SLN incisions (33.7%) and in 93 of 123 ALND (75.4%). Average follow-up was 12 months (range, 3-48) and resulted in a SLNB lymphedema rate of 1.7% (4/237) and ALND of 2.4% (3/123).

Conclusion: ARM identified substantial lymphatic variations draining the upper extremities and facilitated preservation. Metastases in ARM-identified lymph nodes were acceptably low, indicating that ARM is safe. ARM added to present-day ALND and SLNB may be useful to lesser rates of lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confluence of breast and ARM lymphatics typically seen at level III, but variations may place ARM lymphatics within operative field of dissection (Level I or II) or in juxtaposition to SLN. RA=radioactive.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Blue node seen juxtaposed to radioactive SLN (identified by gamma probe and in Babcock) without crossover and able to be spared. Afferent blue lymphatic seen connecting to blue node as well.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ivens D, et al. Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Br J Cancer. 1997;66:136. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Somers RG, et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer, a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1992;215:146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Passik SD, McDonald MV. Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;83:2817–2820. - PubMed
    1. Tobin MB, Lacey HJ, Meyer L, Mortimer PS. The psychosocial morbidity of breast cancer-related arm swelling. Psychological morbidity of lymphedema. Cancer. 1993;72:3248–3252. - PubMed
    1. McMasters KM, Giuliano AE, Ross MI, Reintgen DS, Hunt KK, Byrd DR, Klimberg VS, Whitworth PW, Tafra LC, Edwards MJ. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for breast cancer--not yet the standard of care. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:990–995. 1998. - PubMed

Publication types