The hidden face of academic researches on classified highly pathogenic microorganisms
- PMID: 25445654
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.028
The hidden face of academic researches on classified highly pathogenic microorganisms
Abstract
Highly pathogenic microorganisms and toxins are manipulated in academic laboratories for fundamental research purposes, diagnostics, drugs and vaccines development. Obviously, these infectious pathogens represent a potential risk for human and/or animal health and their accidental or intentional release (biosafety and biosecurity, respectively) is a major concern of governments. In the past decade, several incidents have occurred in laboratories and reported by media causing fear and raising a sense of suspicion against biologists. Some scientists have been ordered by US government to leave their laboratory for long periods of time following the occurrence of an incident involving infectious pathogens; in other cases laboratories have been shut down and universities have been forced to pay fines and incur a long-term ban on funding after gross negligence of biosafety/biosecurity procedures. Measures of criminal sanctions have also been taken to minimize the risk that such incidents can reoccur. As United States and many other countries, France has recently strengthened its legal measures for laboratories' protection. During the past two decades, France has adopted a series of specific restriction measures to better protect scientific discoveries with a potential economic/social impact and prevent their misuse by ill-intentioned people without affecting the progress of science through fundamental research. French legal regulations concerning scientific discoveries have progressively strengthened since 2001, until the publication in November 2011 of a decree concerning the "PPST" (for "Protection du Potentiel Scientifique et Technique de la nation", the protection of sensitive scientific data). Following the same logic of protection of sensitive scientific researches, regulations were also adopted in an order published in April 2012 concerning the biology and health field. The aim was to define the legal framework that precise the conditions for authorizing microorganisms and toxins experimentation in France; these regulations apply for any operation of production, manufacturing, transportation, import, export, possession, supply, transfer, acquisition and use of highly pathogenic microorganisms and toxins, referred to as "MOT" (for "MicroOrganismes et Toxines hautement pathogènes") by the French law. Finally, laboratories conducting researches on such infectious pathogens are henceforth classified restricted area or ZRR (for "Zone à Régime Restrictif"), according an order of July 2012. In terms of economic protection, biosafety and biosecurity, these regulations represent an undeniable progress as compared to the previous condition. However, the competitiveness of research laboratories handling MOTs is likely to suffer the side effects of these severe constraints. For example research teams working on MOTs can be drastically affected both by (i) the indirect costs generated by the security measure to be applied; (ii) the working time devoted to samples recording; (iii) the establishment of traceability and reporting to national security agency ANSM, (iv) the latency period required for staff members being officially authorized to conduct experiments on MOTs; (v) the consequent reduced attractiveness for recruiting new trainees whose work would be significantly hampered by theses administrative constraints; and (vi) the limitations in the exchange of material with external laboratories and collaborators. Importantly, there is a risk that French academic researchers gradually abandon research on MOTs in favor of other projects that are less subject to legal restrictions. This would reduce the acquisition of knowledge in the field of MOTs which, in the long term, could be highly detrimental to the country by increasing its vulnerability to natural epidemics due to pathogenic microorganisms that are classified as MOTs and, by reducing its preparedness against possible bioterrorist attacks that would use such microorganisms.
Keywords: Biological weapons and bioterrorism threats; Biosafety and biosecurity concerns; Highly pathogenic microorganisms; Prohibited experiments; Psychosis; Regulation and criminal sanctions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Negative impact of laws regarding biosecurity and bioterrorism on real diseases.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jun;20(6):507-15. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12709. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014. PMID: 24909400 Review.
-
[Biosafety and biosecurity in the medical laboratory. Update and trends].Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 2007 Jul-Dec;52(3-4):91-9. Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 19326721 Review. Romanian.
-
Biosafety and biosecurity measures: management of biosafety level 3 facilities.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Nov;36 Suppl 1:S70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.026. Epub 2010 Aug 30. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010. PMID: 20801002 Review.
-
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Encephale. 2015. PMID: 25439859 Review. French.
-
Biosafety and biosecurity in veterinary laboratories.Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Aug;36(2):701-709. doi: 10.20506/rst.36.2.2687. Rev Sci Tech. 2017. PMID: 30152450
Cited by
-
Distinct lineages of Ebola virus in Guinea during the 2014 West African epidemic.Nature. 2015 Aug 6;524(7563):102-4. doi: 10.1038/nature14612. Epub 2015 Jun 24. Nature. 2015. PMID: 26106863 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Key Topics Bearing Negative Sentiment on Twitter: Insights Concerning the 2015-2016 Zika Epidemic.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Jun 4;5(2):e11036. doi: 10.2196/11036. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019. PMID: 31165711 Free PMC article.
-
The Culture of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Responsible Conduct in the Life Sciences: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Appl Biosaf. 2019 Mar 1;24(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/1535676018778538. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Appl Biosaf. 2019. PMID: 36034634 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38486252 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment of the benchmarking tool for evaluating the operation of biorepositories for pathogenic resource using a modified Delphi method.Biosaf Health. 2024 Jun 7;6(4):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2024.05.001. eCollection 2024 Aug. Biosaf Health. 2024. PMID: 40078664 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous