Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;28(2):156-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

Process evaluation of an exercise counseling intervention using motivational interviewing

Margaret M McCarthy  1 , Victoria Vaughan Dickson  2 , Stuart D Katz  3 , Kathleen Sciacca  4 , Deborah A Chyun  2
Affiliations

Process evaluation of an exercise counseling intervention using motivational interviewing

Margaret M McCarthy et al. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 May.

Abstract

Aim: To describe the results of the process evaluation of an exercise counseling intervention using motivational interviewing (MI).

Background: Exercise can safely be incorporated into heart failure self-care, but many lack access to cardiac rehabilitation. One alternative is to provide exercise counseling in the clinical setting.

Methods: This process evaluation was conducted according to previously established guidelines for health promotion programs. This includes an assessment of recruitment and retention, implementation, and reach.

Results: Desired number of subjects were recruited, but 25% dropped out during study. Good fidelity to the intervention was achieved; the use of MI was evaluated with improvement in adherence over time. Dose included initial session plus 12 weekly phone calls. Subjects varied in participation of daily diary usage. Setting was conducive to recruitment and data collection.

Conclusions: Evaluating the process of an intervention provides valuable feedback on content, delivery and fidelity.

Keywords: Counseling; Exercise; Heart failure; Program evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Artinian NT, Fletcher GF, Mozaffarian D, Kris-Etherton P, Van Horn L, Lichtenstein AH, et al. Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: A scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2010;122(4):406–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e8edf1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bock C, Jarczok MN, Litaker D. Community-based efforts to promote physical activity: A systematic review of interventions considering mode of delivery, study quality and population subgroups. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport/Sports Medicine Australia. 2014;17(3):276–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1990;16(Suppl. 1):55–58. - PubMed
    1. Cameron J, Worrall-Carter L, Page K, Stewart S. Self-care behaviours and heart failure: Does experience with symptoms really make a difference? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2010;9(2):92–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2020 topics and objectives. physical activity. [Retrieved September 12, 2014];2013 from. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.as....

Publication types