Clinical practice guidelines on prostate cancer: a critical appraisal
- PMID: 25451831
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.105
Clinical practice guidelines on prostate cancer: a critical appraisal
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical practice guidelines are increasingly being used by leading organizations to promote high quality evidence-based patient care. However, the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines developed by different organizations varies considerably. We assessed published clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of localized prostate cancer to evaluate the rigor, applicability and transparency of their recommendations.
Materials and methods: We searched for English based clinical practice guidelines on treatment of localized prostate cancer from leading organizations in the 15-year period from 1999 to 2014. Clinical practice guidelines limited to early detection, screening, staging and/or diagnosis of prostate cancer were excluded from analysis. Four independent reviewers used the validated AGREE II instrument to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines in 6 domains, including 1) scope and purpose, 2) stakeholder involvement, 3) rigor of development, 4) clarity of presentation, 5) applicability and 6) editorial independence.
Results: A total of 13 clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria. Overall the highest median scores were in the AGREE II domains of clarity of presentation, editorial independence, and scope and purpose. The lowest median score was for applicability (28.1%). Although the median score of editorial independence was high (85.4%), variability was also substantial (IQR 12.5-100). NICE and AUA clinical practice guidelines consistently scored well in most domains.
Conclusions: Clinical practice guidelines from different organizations on treatment of localized prostate cancer are of variable quality and fall short of current standards in certain areas, especially in applicability and stakeholder involvement. Improvements in these key domains can enhance the impact and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
Keywords: Florida; evidence-based medicine; government; practice guidelines as topic; prostatic neoplasms.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer: How good are guidelines for localized prostate cancer?Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Mar;12(3):127-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 3. Nat Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 25644156 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A critical appraisal and comparison of the quality and recommendations of glaucoma clinical practice guidelines.Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.038. Epub 2011 Apr 20. Ophthalmology. 2011. PMID: 21507487
-
An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.06.012. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16413451
-
International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):2000-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15143093
-
Review and evaluation of the Dutch guidelines for osteoporosis.J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;12(5):539-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00647.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 16987116 Review.
-
EAU, AUA and NICE Guidelines on Surgical and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Critical Appraisal of the Guidelines Using the AGREE-II Tool.Urol Int. 2022;106(1):1-10. doi: 10.1159/000517675. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Urol Int. 2022. PMID: 34350885 Review.
Cited by
-
Prostate cancer: Estimated life expectancy: integration of age and comorbidities.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):634-635. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.203. Epub 2016 Oct 18. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27754470 No abstract available.
-
Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 15;20(4):e1444. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1444. eCollection 2024 Dec. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39417000 Free PMC article.
-
Are 10-, 10-12-, or > 12-mm prostate biopsy core quality control cutoffs reasonable?World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1055-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2242-6. Epub 2018 Mar 1. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29497860
-
Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology.World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1489-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2278-7. Epub 2018 Apr 2. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29610962
-
Guideline-based management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Indian J Urol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):320-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.163305. Indian J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26604443 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous