Clinician proficiency in delivering manual treatment for neck pain within specified force ranges
- PMID: 25452013
- PMCID: PMC4375060
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.016
Clinician proficiency in delivering manual treatment for neck pain within specified force ranges
Abstract
Background context: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint responsive to manual therapies. Doctors of chiropractic commonly use manual cervical distraction, a mobilization procedure, to treat neck pain patients. However, it is unknown if clinicians can consistently apply standardized cervical traction forces, a critical step toward identifying an optimal therapeutic dose.
Purpose: To assess clinicians' proficiency in delivering manually applied traction forces within specified ranges to neck pain patients.
Study design: An observational study nested within a randomized clinical trial.
Sample: Two research clinicians provided study interventions to 48 participants with neck pain.
Outcome measures: Clinician proficiency in delivering cervical traction forces within three specified ranges (low force, less than 20 N; medium force, 21-50 N; and high force 51-100 N).
Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to three force-based treatment groups. Participants received five manual cervical distraction treatments over 2 weeks while lying prone on a treatment table instrumented with force sensors. Two clinicians delivered manual traction forces according to treatment groups. Clinicians treated participants first without real-time visual feedback displaying traction force and then with visual feedback. Peak traction force data were extracted and descriptively analyzed.
Results: Clinicians delivered manual cervical distraction treatments within the prescribed traction force ranges 75% of the time without visual feedback and 97% of the time with visual feedback.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that doctors of chiropractic can successfully deliver prescribed traction forces while treating neck pain patients, enabling the capability to conduct force-based dose response clinical studies.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01765751.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Chiropractic; Clinician training; Dose; Manual therapy; Mobilization; Neck pain; Traction forces.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223. - PubMed
-
- Picavet HS, Schouten JS. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178. - PubMed
-
- Cote P, van d V, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32:S70–S86. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical