Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide
- PMID: 25453885
- DOI: 10.1583/14-4744MR.1
Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of a novel absorbable vascular closure device (ExoSeal) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with femoral access compared to the established collagen-based (Angio-Seal) and suture-mediated (ProGlide) closure devices.
Methods: This prospective, observational, dual-center, non-randomized, non-blinded study enrolled 1013 patients (65.1 ± 11.8 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization via a common femoral artery access in which hemostasis was achieved using a vascular closure device (255 Angio-Seal, 258 ProGlide, and 500 ExoSeal). In hospital complications (bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, vessel occlusion, dissection, and arteriovenous fistula) of the puncture site and device failures (persistent bleeding) were recorded and compared for ExoSeal vs. the established devices (Angio-Seal + ProGlide).
Results: There were more complications after utilization of ExoSeal compared to established devices (3.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.012). No significant difference was observed in the device success rate between the established vascular closure devices (96.3%) and the novel device (94.8%, p=0.28). Considering each closure system, Angio-Seal had the lowest complication rate (0.4%) and the highest efficacy (99.2%); the latter differed significantly from ExoSeal (94.8%, p=0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed a >3-fold odds of complications when using ExoSeal, which remained unchanged in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Utilization of the novel vascular closure device is associated with a higher complication rate and a similar device failure rate compared to collagen-based and suture-mediated devices, with Angio-Seal having the lowest complication and device failure rates.
Keywords: absorbable plug; collagen-based closure device; complications; femoral artery access; hemostasis; suture-mediated closure device; vascular access; vascular closure devices.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):402-407. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27116. Epub 2017 May 13. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 28500743 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):119-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22940. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21681898
-
Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):366-75. doi: 10.1583/09-2960.1. J Endovasc Ther. 2010. PMID: 20557177
-
Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;96(2):285-295. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29061. Epub 2020 Jun 10. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32521099
-
Complication rates associated with antegrade use of vascular closure devices: a systematic review and pooled analysis.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):722-730.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.133. Epub 2020 Sep 17. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32950629
Cited by
-
[Management of complications after revascularization due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease : Prophylaxis and consistent adequate therapy after timely diagnostics].Chirurg. 2015 Jul;86(7):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0042-8. Chirurg. 2015. PMID: 26138013 German.
-
ULSOSEAL Technique: A Unique Technique to Achieve Hemostasis Using ExoSeal in High-Risk Patients after Common Femoral Artery Puncture.J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 28;2021:2470333. doi: 10.1155/2021/2470333. eCollection 2021. J Interv Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34526872 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study.J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Mar 7;2023:7533702. doi: 10.1155/2023/7533702. eCollection 2023. J Interv Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36925758 Free PMC article.
-
A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1883-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02940-z. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34386892 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical