What we know, and don't know, about the impact of state policy and systems-level interventions on prescription drug overdose
- PMID: 25454406
- PMCID: PMC6557270
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.001
What we know, and don't know, about the impact of state policy and systems-level interventions on prescription drug overdose
Abstract
Background: Drug overdose deaths have been rising since the early 1990s and is the leading cause of injury death in the United States. Overdose from prescription opioids constitutes a large proportion of this burden. State policy and systems-level interventions have the potential to impact prescription drug misuse and overdose.
Methods: We searched the literature to identify evaluations of state policy or systems-level interventions using non-comparative, cross-sectional, before-after, time series, cohort, or comparison group designs or randomized/non-randomized trials. Eligible studies examined intervention effects on provider behavior, patient behavior, and health outcomes.
Results: Overall study quality is low, with a limited number of time-series or experimental designs. Knowledge and prescribing practices were measured more often than health outcomes (e.g., overdoses). Limitations include lack of baseline data and comparison groups, inadequate statistical testing, small sample sizes, self-reported outcomes, and short-term follow-up. Strategies that reduce inappropriate prescribing and use of multiple providers and focus on overdose response, such as prescription drug monitoring programs, insurer strategies, pain clinic legislation, clinical guidelines, and naloxone distribution programs, are promising. Evidence of improved health outcomes, particularly from safe storage and disposal strategies and patient education, is weak.
Conclusions: While important efforts are underway to affect prescriber and patient behavior, data on state policy and systems-level interventions are limited and inconsistent. Improving the evidence base is a critical need so states, regulatory agencies, and organizations can make informed choices about policies and practices that will improve prescribing and use, while protecting patient health.
Keywords: Evaluation; Opioids; Overdose; Pain; Policy; Prescribing.
Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
No conflict declared.
Figures
References
-
- Academy of Managed Care PharmacyShoemaker, S., Pozniak A, Subramanian R, Mauch D, 2010. Effect of six managed care pharmacy tools: A review of the literature. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 16 (6 Suppl), S3–S20. - PubMed
-
- Albert S, Brason F, Sanford C, Dasgupta N, Graham J, Lovette B, 2011. Project Lazarus: community-based overdose prevention in rural North Carolina. Pain Med. 12, S77–S85. - PubMed
-
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management, 2012. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists task force on acute pain management. Anesthesiology 116, 248–273. - PubMed
-
- Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann H, Oxman A, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt G, 2011. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64, 401–406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
