Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics

K Allen Greiner  1 , Christine M Daley  2 , Aaron Epp  3 , Aimee James  4 , Hung-Wen Yeh  5 , Mugur Geana  6 , Wendi Born  3 , Kimberly K Engelman  7 , Jeremy Shellhorn  8 , Christina M Hester  9 , Joseph LeMaster  3 , Daniel C Buckles  10 , Edward F Ellerbeck  7
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics

K Allen Greiner et al. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Low-income and racial/ethnic minority populations experience disproportionate colorectal cancer (CRC) burden and poorer survival. Novel behavioral strategies are needed to improve screening rates in these groups.

Background: The study aimed to test a theoretically based "implementation intentions" intervention for improving CRC screening among unscreened adults in urban safety-net clinics.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting/participants: Adults (N=470) aged ≥50 years, due for CRC screening, from urban safety-net clinics were recruited.

Intervention: The intervention (conducted in 2009-2011) was delivered via touchscreen computers that tailored informational messages to decisional stage and screening barriers. The computer then randomized participants to generic health information on diet and exercise (Comparison group) or "implementation intentions" questions and planning (Experimental group) specific to the CRC screening test chosen (fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy).

Main outcome measures: The primary study outcome was completion of CRC screening at 26 weeks based on test reports (analysis conducted in 2012-2013).

Results: The study population had a mean age of 57 years and was 42% non-Hispanic African American, 28% non-Hispanic white, and 27% Hispanic. Those receiving the implementation intentions-based intervention had higher odds (AOR=1.83, 95% CI=1.23, 2.73) of completing CRC screening than the Comparison group. Those with higher self-efficacy for screening (AOR=1.57, 95% CI=1.03, 2.39), history of asthma (AOR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26, 3.84), no history of diabetes (AOR=1.86, 95% CI=1.21, 2.86), and reporting they had never heard that "cutting on cancer" makes it spread (AOR=1.78, 95% CI=1.16, 2.72) were more likely to complete CRC screening.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that programs incorporating an implementation intentions approach can contribute to successful completion of CRC screening even among very low-income and diverse primary care populations. Future initiatives to reduce CRC incidence and mortality disparities may be able to employ implementation intentions in large-scale efforts to encourage screening and prevention behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00594113.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
The integrated Precaution Adoption Process Model and Implementation Intentions concept applied to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ko CW, Kreuter W, Baldwin LM. Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Dec 9–23;162(22):2581–2586. - PubMed
    1. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F. Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in a demographically defined region of the southern U.S. Cancer. 2002 Nov 15;95(10):2211–2222. - PubMed
    1. Holmes-Rovner M, Williams GA, Hoppough S, Quillan L, Butler R, Given CW. Colorectal cancer screening barriers in persons with low income. Cancer Pract. 2002 Sep-Oct;10(5):240–247. - PubMed
    1. Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, Seeff LC. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2002 Sep;35(3):199–206. - PubMed
    1. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Nov 21;93(22):1704–1713. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data