Surgical strategy for low rectal cancers
- PMID: 25455959
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.10.005
Surgical strategy for low rectal cancers
Abstract
The two goals of surgery for lower rectal cancer surgery are to obtain clear "curative" margins and to limit post-surgical functional disorders. The question of whether or not to preserve the anal sphincter lies at the center of the therapeutic choice. Histologically, tumor-free distal and circumferential margins of>1mm allow a favorable oncologic outcome. Whether such margins can be obtained depends of TNM staging, tumor location, response to chemoradiotherapy and type of surgical procedure. The technique of intersphincteric resection relies on these narrow margins to spare the sphincter. This procedure provides satisfactory oncologic outcome with a rate of circumferential margin involvement ranging from 5% to 11%, while good continence is maintained in half of the patients. The extralevator abdominoperineal resection provides good oncologic results, however this procedure requires a permanent colostomy. A permanent colostomy alters several domains of quality of life when located at the classical abdominal site but not when brought out at the perineal site as a perineal colostomy.
Keywords: Cancer; Clinical update; Intersphincteric resection; Low rectum; Perineal colostomy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of fecal continence and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection plus perineal colostomy for ultra-low rectal cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(4):225-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23379. Epub 2013 Jul 19. J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23868337
-
Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Apr;47(4):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0088-4. Epub 2004 Feb 25. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 14978613 Clinical Trial.
-
Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Oct 20;121(20):2016-20. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008. PMID: 19080267
-
Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jan;10(1):3-15; discussion 15-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01226.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 17477848 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy.Colorectal Dis. 2006 Sep;8 Suppl 3:10-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01063.x. Colorectal Dis. 2006. PMID: 16813585 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of wait and see strategy versus radical surgery and local excision for rectal cancer with cCR response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 31;18(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02003-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32862826 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Self-efficacy Intervention on Quality of Life of Patients With Intestinal Stoma.Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;41(4):341-346. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000290. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018. PMID: 28727664 Free PMC article.
-
Inferior mesenteric artery ligation level in rectal cancer surgery: still no answer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 26;408(1):286. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03022-z. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 37493853 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources