Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Feb:25:104-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

Development and validation of a seizure prediction model in critically ill children

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Development and validation of a seizure prediction model in critically ill children

Amy Yang et al. Seizure. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Electrographic seizures are common in encephalopathic critically ill children, but identification requires continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). Development of a seizure prediction model would enable more efficient use of limited CEEG resources. We aimed to develop and validate a seizure prediction model for use among encephalopathic critically ill children.

Method: We developed a seizure prediction model using a retrospectively acquired multi-center database of children with acute encephalopathy without an epilepsy diagnosis, who underwent clinically indicated CEEG. We performed model validation using a separate prospectively acquired single center database. Predictor variables were chosen to be readily available to clinicians prior to the onset of CEEG and included: age, etiology category, clinical seizures prior to CEEG, initial EEG background category, and inter-ictal discharge category.

Results: The model has fair to good discrimination ability and overall performance. At the optimal cut-off point in the validation dataset, the model has a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 81%. Varied cut-off points could be chosen to optimize sensitivity or specificity depending on available CEEG resources.

Conclusion: Despite inherent variability between centers, a model developed using multi-center CEEG data and few readily available variables could guide the use of limited CEEG resources when applied at a single center. Depending on CEEG resources, centers could choose lower cut-off points to maximize identification of all patients with seizures (but with more patients monitored) or higher cut-off points to reduce resource utilization by reducing monitoring of lower risk patients (but with failure to identify some patients with seizures).

Keywords: EEG monitoring; Non-convulsive seizure; Pediatric; Prediction model; Seizure; Status epilepticus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics are provided for the creation (left) and validation (right) datasets. Top. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Middle. Validation plots of prediction model for residual masses in creation data and validation data. Calibration is shown with a non-parametric line (dot). Distribution of the predicted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals are indicated by groups of patients (triangles with vertical line) and for individual patients (vertical lines). Vertical lines upwards represent patients with seizures; lines downwards represent patients without seizures. The threshold value was chosen to be 20% (downwards arrow). Bottom. Box plots of predicted probabilities in creation and validation datasets. Group means are displayed as filled squares. Points outside 1.5 interquartile ranges are displayed as unfilled circles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abend NS, Wusthoff CJ, Goldberg EM, Dlugos DJ. Electrographic seizures and status epilepticus in critically ill children and neonates with encephalopathy. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:1170–9. - PubMed
    1. Hosain SA, Solomon GE, Kobylarz EJ. Electroencephalographic patterns in unresponsive pediatric patients. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;32:162–5. - PubMed
    1. Jette N, Claassen J, Emerson RG, Hirsch LJ. Frequency and predictors of nonconvulsive seizures during continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in critically ill children. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1750–5. - PubMed
    1. Abend NS, Dlugos DJ. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Neurol. 2007;37:165–70. - PubMed
    1. Tay SK, Hirsch LJ, Leary L, Jette N, Wittman J, Akman CI. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in children: clinical and EEG characteristics. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1504–9. - PubMed