Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb:125:1-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

3D in vitro modeling of the central nervous system

Affiliations
Review

3D in vitro modeling of the central nervous system

Amy M Hopkins et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

There are currently more than 600 diseases characterized as affecting the central nervous system (CNS) which inflict neural damage. Unfortunately, few of these conditions have effective treatments available. Although significant efforts have been put into developing new therapeutics, drugs which were promising in the developmental phase have high attrition rates in late stage clinical trials. These failures could be circumvented if current 2D in vitro and in vivo models were improved. 3D, tissue-engineered in vitro systems can address this need and enhance clinical translation through two approaches: (1) bottom-up, and (2) top-down (developmental/regenerative) strategies to reproduce the structure and function of human tissues. Critical challenges remain including biomaterials capable of matching the mechanical properties and extracellular matrix (ECM) composition of neural tissues, compartmentalized scaffolds that support heterogeneous tissue architectures reflective of brain organization and structure, and robust functional assays for in vitro tissue validation. The unique design parameters defined by the complex physiology of the CNS for construction and validation of 3D in vitro neural systems are reviewed here.

Keywords: 3D in vitro model; Blood–brain barrier; Central nervous systems; Tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of 3D tissue modeling subfield. Amy Hopkins, Elise DeSimone, Karolina Chwalek and David Kaplan, Progress in Neurobiology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A graphical summary of key milestones in clinical neuroscience. Amy Hopkins, Elise DeSimone, Karolina Chwalek and David Kaplan, Progress in Neurobiology.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Traditional tissue engineering techniques. Amy Hopkins, Elise DeSimone, Karolina Chwalek and David Kaplan, Progress in Neurobiology.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representation of the PNN. Amy Hopkins, Elise DeSimone, Karolina Chwalek and David Kaplan, Progress in Neurobiology.

References

    1. Abbott NJ. Astrocyte-endothelial interactions and blood-brain barrier permeability. J. Anat. 2002;200:629–638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahearne M, Yang Y, El Haj AJ, Then KY, Liu K-K. Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-based constructs for tissue engineering applications. J. R. Soc. Interface R. Soc. 2005;2:455–463. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahearne M, Liu K-K, El Haj AJ, Then KY, Rauz S, Yang Y. Online monitoring of the mechanical behavior of collagen hydrogels: influence of corneal fibroblasts on elastic modulus. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2010;16:319–327. - PubMed
    1. Al Ahmad A, Taboada CB, Gassmann M, Ogunshola OO. Astrocytes and pericytes differentially modulate blood-brain barrier characteristics during development and hypoxic insult. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. Off. J. Int. Soc. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:693–705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albergaria C, Carey MR. All Purkinje cells are not created equal. eLife. 2014;3 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances