Contingency management improves smoking cessation treatment outcomes among highly impulsive adolescent smokers relative to cognitive behavioral therapy
- PMID: 25462659
- PMCID: PMC4285343
- DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.009
Contingency management improves smoking cessation treatment outcomes among highly impulsive adolescent smokers relative to cognitive behavioral therapy
Abstract
Background: Impulsive adolescents have difficulty quitting smoking. We examined if treatments that provide behavioral incentives for abstinence improve treatment outcomes among impulsive adolescent smokers, who have been shown to be highly sensitive to reward.
Methods: We ran secondary data analyses on 64 teen smokers (mean age=16.36 [1.44]; cigarettes/day=13.97 [6.61]; 53.1% female; 90.6% Caucasian) who completed a four-week smoking cessation trial to determine whether impulsive adolescents differentially benefit from receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), contingency management (CM), or the combination of the two (CM/CBT). Indices of treatment efficacy included self-report percent days abstinent and end of treatment biochemically-confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence (EOT abstinence). We assessed self-reported impulsivity using the Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. We used univariate Generalized Linear Modeling to examine main effects and interactions of impulsivity and treatment condition as predictors of self-reported abstinence, and exact logistic regression to examine EOT abstinence.
Results: CM/CBT and CM were comparably effective in promoting abstinence, so analyses were conducted comparing the efficacy of CBT to treatments with a CM component (i.e., CM and CM/CBT). CBT and deficient self-regulation predicted lower self-reported abstinence rates within the total analytic sample. Treatments containing CM were more effective than CBT in predicting 1) self-reported abstinence among behaviorally impulsive adolescents (% days abstinent: CM 77%; CM/CBT 81%; CBT 30%) and 2) EOT point prevalence abstinence among behaviorally impulsive adolescents and adolescents with significant deficits in self-regulation.
Conclusion: CM-based interventions may improve the low smoking cessation rates previously observed among impulsive adolescent smokers.
Keywords: Adolescent; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Contingency management; Impulsivity; Smoking cessation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Morean, Kong, Camenga, Cavallo, Carroll, Krishnan-Sarin and Mr. Pittman declare that they have no actual or potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Audrain-Mcgovern J, Rodriguez D, Tercyak KP, Neuner G, Moss HB. The impact of self-control indices on peer smoking and adolescent smoking progression. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31:139–51. - PubMed
-
- Byrne BM, Watkins D. The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2003;34:155–175.
-
- Cavallo DA, Cooney JL, Duhig AM, Smith AE, Liss TB, Mcfetridge AK, Babuscio T, Nich C, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, Krishnan-Sarin S. Combining cognitive behavioral therapy with contingency management for smoking cessation in adolescent smokers: a preliminary comparison of two different CBT formats. Am J Addict. 2007;16:468–74. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Corby EA, Roll JM, Ledgerwood DM, Schuster CR. Contingency management interventions for treating the substance abuse of adolescents: a feasibility study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8:371–6. - PubMed
-
- Doran N, Mcchargue D, Cohen L. Impulsivity and the reinforcing value of cigarette smoking. Addict Behav. 2007;32:90–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous