Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 May;67(5):959-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.049. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Roger L Sur et al. Eur Urol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background: Using a selective α-blocker for medical expulsive therapy (MET) is a cost-effective treatment approach widely used for ureteral stones.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of silodosin, a selective α-1a receptor antagonist, in this setting.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter, phase 2 study conducted in adult patients with a unilateral ureteral calculus of 4-10mm. Of 239 patients in the safety population, six discontinued due to adverse events.

Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive silodosin 8 mg or placebo for up to 4 wk.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was spontaneous stone passage, analyzed using logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included time to stone passage, emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, analgesic use, and incidence and severity of pain.

Results and limitations: No significant differences between the silodosin and placebo groups were observed for passage rate of all stones (52% vs 44%, respectively; p=0.2). However, silodosin achieved a significantly greater rate of distal ureter stone passage than placebo (p=0.01). Significant differences were not observed for ER visits, hospital admission, or use of analgesics. The number of patients in the intent-to-treat population was slightly below the calculated sample size (232 vs 240) and sample sizes were not calculated for subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: This is among the first prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trials to examine the efficacy of a selective α-1a antagonist as MET in patients with ureteral calculi and did not demonstrate a benefit to the entire ureter. However, silodosin was found to be well tolerated and beneficial in facilitating the passage of distal ureteral stones, warranting additional future studies on distal stone elimination.

Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the efficacy of silodosin for the treatment of ureteral stones. We found that silodosin increased passage of distal ureteral stones.

Keywords: Adrenergic α-blockers; Medical expulsion therapy; Nephrolithiasis; Silodosin; Ureteral calculi; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources