Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 2:12:66.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-66.

A systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications

Christine Kriza  1 , Jill Hanass-Hancock, Emmanuel Ankrah Odame, Nicola Deghaye, Rashid Aman, Philip Wahlster, Mayra Marin, Nicodemus Gebe, Willis Akhwale, Isabelle Wachsmuth, Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas
Affiliations

A systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications

Christine Kriza et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many "resource-poor" settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for "resource-poor" settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for "resource-limited" settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria.

Results: Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context.

Conclusions: An appropriate HTA tool for "resource-constrained" settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Asua BJ. [The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) or the need for collaboration in the evaluation of health technologies] Med Clin (Barc) 1999;112:86–89. - PubMed
    1. Chalkidou K, Levine R, Dillon A. Helping poorer countries make locally informed health decisions. BMJ. 2010;12(04):23. 341. - PubMed
    1. Pichon-Riviere A, Augustovski F, García Martí S, Sullivan SD, Drummond M. Transferability of health technology assessment reports in Latin America: An exploratory survey of researchers and decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):180–186. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panerai RB, Almeida RT, Freire SM, Chaim DM, Miranda MZ, Madureira LC, Aguiar Neto MA. Perspectives on health technology assessment in Latin America. The case of perinatal care in the literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9(1):76–84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462300003044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kularatna S, Whitty JA, Johnson NW, Scuffham PA. Health state valuation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Value Health. 2013;16(6):1091–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources