Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;84(1):33-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 8.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: correlation of modified NIH risk stratification with diffusion-weighted MR imaging as an imaging biomarker

Affiliations

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: correlation of modified NIH risk stratification with diffusion-weighted MR imaging as an imaging biomarker

Tae Wook Kang et al. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation of risk grade of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) based on modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria with conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging.

Methods: We included 22 patients with histopathologically proven GISTs in the stomach or small bowel who underwent pre-operative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DW imaging. We retrospectively assessed correlations between morphologic findings, qualitative (signal intensity, consensus from two observers) and quantitative (degree of dynamic enhancement using signal intensity of tumour/muscle ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) values, and the modified NIH criteria for risk stratification. Spearman partial correlation analysis was used to control for tumour size as a confounding factor. The optimal cut-off level of ADC values for intermediate or high risk GISTs was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: Except tumour size and necrosis, conventional MR imaging findings, including the degree of dynamic enhancement, were not significantly different according to the modified NIH criteria (p>0.05). Tumour ADC values were negatively correlated with the modified NIH criteria, before and after adjustment of tumour size (ρ=-0.754; p<0.001 and ρ=-0.513; p=0.017, respectively). The optimal cut-off value for the determination of intermediate or high-risk GISTs was 1.279 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (100% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity, 81.8% accuracy).

Conclusion: Except tumour size and necrosis, conventional MR imaging findings did not correlate with the risk grade. However, the ADC value can be used as an imaging biomarker to assess the risk grade of GISTs, regardless of tumour size.

Keywords: Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Gastrointestinal stromal tumour; Magnetic resonance imaging; Risk grade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources