Bowel problem management among nursing home residents: a mixed methods study
- PMID: 25469107
- PMCID: PMC4251841
- DOI: 10.1186/s12912-014-0035-9
Bowel problem management among nursing home residents: a mixed methods study
Abstract
Background: Bowel problems such as constipation, diarrhoea and faecal incontinence (FI) are prevalent conditions among nursing home residents and little is known about nursing management. This study aimed to elucidate how Norwegian registered nurses (RNs) manage bowel problems among nursing home residents.
Methods: A mixed methods approach was used combining quantitative data from a population-based cross-sectional survey and qualitative data from a focus group interview. In the cross sectional part of the study 27 of 28 nursing homes in one Norwegian municipality participated. Residents were included if they, at the time of data collection, had been a resident in a nursing home for more than three weeks or had prior stays of more than four weeks during the last six months. Residents were excluded from the study if they were younger than 65 years or had a stoma (N = 980 after exclusions). RNs filled in a questionnaire for residents regarding FI, constipation, diarrhoea, and treatments/interventions. In the focus group interview, 8 RNs participated. The focus group interview used an interview guide that included six open-ended questions.
Results: Pad use (88.9%) and fixed toilet schedules (38.6%) were the most commonly used interventions for residents with FI. In addition, the qualitative data showed that controlled emptying of the bowels with laxatives and/or enemas was common. Common interventions for residents with constipation were laxatives (66.2%) and enemas (47%), dietary interventions (7.3%) and manual emptying of feces (6.3%). In addition, the qualitative data showed that the RNs also used fixed toilet schedules for residents with constipation. Interventions for residents with diarrhoea were Loperamide (18.3%) and dietary interventions (20.1%). RNs described bowel care management as challenging due to limited time and resources. Consequently, compromises were a part of their working strategies.
Conclusions: Constipation was considered to be the main focus of bowel management. Emptying the residents' bowels was the aim of nursing intervention. FI was mainly treated passively with pads and interventions for residents with diarrhoea were limited. The RNs prioritized routine tasks in the nursing homes due to limited resources, and thereby compromising with the resident's need for individualized bowel care.
Keywords: Constipation; Cross-sectional survey; Diarrhoea; Faecal incontinence; Focus groups; Nursing homes.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Constipation: assessment and management in an institutionalized elderly population.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Sep;42(9):947-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06585.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994. PMID: 8064102
-
Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893. Evid Based Child Health. 2013. PMID: 23878124 Review.
-
The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: effects on process quality.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):977-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02970.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997. PMID: 9256852
-
Effectiveness of individualised intervention on older residents with constipation in nursing home: a randomised controlled trial.J Clin Nurs. 2015 Dec;24(23-24):3449-58. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12974. Epub 2015 Sep 30. J Clin Nurs. 2015. PMID: 26420770 Clinical Trial.
-
Leadership and registered nurses (RNs) working after-hours in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs): A structured literature review.J Clin Nurs. 2018 Nov;27(21-22):3872-3881. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14565. Epub 2018 Jul 24. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29893469 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility, acceptability, and adherence of two educational programs for care staff concerning nursing home patients' fecal incontinence: a pilot study preceding a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Implement Sci. 2015 May 23;10:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0263-8. Implement Sci. 2015. PMID: 26002520 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Using the TrueLoo Smart Device to Record Toileting Sessions in Older Adults: Retrospective Validation and Acceptance Study.JMIR Aging. 2024 May 27;7:e50856. doi: 10.2196/50856. JMIR Aging. 2024. PMID: 38801659 Free PMC article.
-
Management of constipation in long-term care hospitals and its ward manager and organization factors.BMC Nurs. 2020 Jan 16;19:5. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-0398-z. eCollection 2020. BMC Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31988637 Free PMC article.
-
Caregiver insights on challenges and needs in fecal incontinence products: a mixed methods study.Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 9;13:1453244. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1453244. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40552222 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' Burden of Elimination Care: Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Design.Int J Gen Med. 2023 Sep 6;16:4067-4076. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S424424. eCollection 2023. Int J Gen Med. 2023. PMID: 37700744 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Norton C, Whitehead W, Bliss D, Harari D, Lang J. Conservative and Pharmacological Management of Faecal Incontinence in Adults. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 4. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd; 2009. pp. 1322–1386.
-
- MacDonald CD, Butler L. Silent no more: elderly women’s stories of living with urinary incontinence in long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. 2007;33:14–20. - PubMed
-
- Rolland Y, Aquino JP, Andrieu S, Beard J, Benetos A, Berrut G, Coll-Planas L, Dartigues JF, Dong B, Forette F, Franco A, Franzoni S, Hornez T, Metais P, Ruault G, Stephan E, Swagerty D, Tolson D, Volicer L, Vellas B, Morley J. Identification of the main domains for quality of care and clinical research in nursing homes. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011;15:410–424. doi: 10.1007/s12603-011-0091-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kinsella K, He W. An Aging World: 2008. U.S. Census Bureau, International Population Reports, P95/09-1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2009.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources