Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;5(5):541-3.
doi: 10.3945/an.114.006411.

Caffeine-containing energy drinks: beginning to address the gaps in what we know

Caffeine-containing energy drinks: beginning to address the gaps in what we know

Barbara C Sorkin et al. Adv Nutr. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Energy drinks are relatively new to the United States but are the fastest growing segment of the beverage market. Humans have a long history of consuming caffeine in traditional beverages, such as cocoa, coffee, tea, and yerba maté, but 2 workshops held at the Institute of Medicine (http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Nutrition/PotentialHazardsCaffeineSupplements/2013-AUG-05.aspx) and the NIH (http://ods.od.nih.gov/News/EnergyDrinksWorkshop2013.aspx) in 2013 highlighted many critical gaps in understanding the biologic and behavioral effects of the mixtures of caffeine, vitamins, herbs, sugar or other sweeteners, and other ingredients that typify caffeine-containing energy drinks (CCEDs). For example, different surveys over the same 2010–2012 timeframe report discrepant prevalence of CCED use by teenagers, ranging from 10.3% in 13–17 y olds to >30% of those in grades 10 and 12. Understanding of functional interactions between CCED ingredients, drivers of use, and biologic and behavioral effects is limited. The 4 speakers in the Experimental Biology 2014 symposium titled “Energy Drinks: Current Knowledge and Critical Research Gaps” described recent progress by their groups in extending our understanding of prevalence of CCED use, sources of caffeine in the United States, drivers of CCED use, and behavioral correlations and effects of CCEDs, including effects on attractiveness of both alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: B. C. Sorkin and P. M. Coates, no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Terry-McElrath YM, O’Malley PM, Johnston LD. Energy drinks, soft drinks, and substance use among United States secondary school students. J Addict Med 2014;8:6–13 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency, Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Report. 1 in 10 energy drink-related emergency department visits results in hospitalization. 13 March 2014 [cited 2014 May 19]. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/spotlight/spot124-energy-drinks-2014.pdf
    1. Mitchell DC, Knight CA, Hockenberry J, Teplansky R, Hartman TJ. Beverage caffeine intakes in the U.S. Food Chem Toxicol 2014;63:136–42. - PubMed
    1. Branum AM, Rossen LM, Schoendorf KC. Trends in caffeine intake among US children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2014;133:386–93 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knutson KL, Van Cauter E, Rathouz PJ, Yan LL, Hulley SB, Liu K, Lauderdale DS. Association between sleep and blood pressure in mid-life: the CARDIA Sleep Study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1055–61 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types