Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;15(12):1072-80.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400225.

Development of the science of mass casualty incident management: reflection on the medical response to the Wenchuan earthquake and Hangzhou bus fire

Affiliations

Development of the science of mass casualty incident management: reflection on the medical response to the Wenchuan earthquake and Hangzhou bus fire

Wei-feng Shen et al. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: In this paper, we review the previous classic research paradigms of a mass casualty incident (MCI) systematically and reflect the medical response to the Wenchuan earthquake and Hangzhou bus fire, in order to outline and develop an improved research paradigm for MCI management.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, China Wanfang, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases for relevant studies. The following key words and medical subject headings were used: 'mass casualty incident', 'MCI', 'research method', 'Wenchuan', 'earthquake', 'research paradigm', 'science of surge', 'surge', 'surge capacity', and 'vulnerability'. Searches were performed without year or language restriction. After searching the four literature databases using the above listed key words and medical subject headings, related articles containing research paradigms of MCI, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, July 5 bus fire, and science of surge and vulnerability were independently included by two authors.

Results: The current progresses on MCI management include new golden hour, damage control philosophy, chain of survival, and three links theory. In addition, there are three evaluation methods (medical severity index (MSI), potential injury creating event (PICE) classification, and disaster severity scale (DSS)), which can dynamically assess the MCI situations and decisions for MCI responses and can be made based on the results of such evaluations. However, the three methods only offer a retrospective evaluation of MCI and thus fail to develop a real-time assessment of MCI responses. Therefore, they cannot be used as practical guidance for decision-making during MCI. Although the theory of surge science has made great improvements, we found that a very important factor has been ignored-vulnerability, based on reflecting on the MCI response to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and July 5 bus fire in Hangzhou.

Conclusions: This new paradigm breaks through the limitation of traditional research paradigms and will contribute to the development of a methodology for disaster research.

Keywords: Earthquake; Fire incident; Mass casualty incident; Surge; Vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethics guidelines: Wei-feng SHEN, Li-bing JIANG, Guan-yu JIANG, Mao ZHANG, Yue-feng MA, and Xiao-jun HE declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adini B, Peleg K, Cohen R, et al. A national system for disseminating information on victims during mass casualty incidents. Disasters. 2010;34(2):542–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01142.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashkenazi I, Kessel B, Olsha O, et al. Defining the problem, main objective, and strategies of medical management in mass-casualty incidents caused by terrorist events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):82–89. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X0000563X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aylwin CJ, König TC, Brennan NW, et al. Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. Lancet. 2006;368(9554):2219–2225. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69896-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, et al. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 141–156.
    1. Chen Z, Shen J, Kang JX, et al. Emergency medical rescue after major earthquakes: lessons from the Wenchuan earthquake. Chin J Evid-Based Med. 2012;12(4):383–392. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2012.04.004. (in Chinese) - DOI

Publication types