Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 27:7:2169-73.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S70930. eCollection 2014.

Cytologic surveillance versus immediate colposcopy for women with a cervical smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in a poor setting in Nigeria

Lo Ajah  1 , Co Chigbu  2 , He Onah  2 , Ca Iyoke  2 , Ol Lawani  3 , Po Ezeonu  3
Affiliations

Cytologic surveillance versus immediate colposcopy for women with a cervical smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in a poor setting in Nigeria

Lo Ajah et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Ideally, all patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smear cytology results should undergo colposcopic examination of the cervix, but low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) can also be followed up with further Papanicolaou smear surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of cytologic surveillance versus immediate colposcopy in women with a cervical smear diagnosis of LSIL.

Methods: This was a prospective comparative study of 240 eligible consenting women consecutively grouped into cervical surveillance for 6 months versus immediate colposcopy at a ratio of 1:1. Free cervical smear cytology, colposcopy, and biopsy, as well as histology, were provided for all study participants.

Results: The regression, persistence, and progression rates with 6 months of cytologic surveillance of LSIL were 46.1%, 43.4%, and 3.9%, respectively. The difference between the proportions of women who had an eventual histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ in both groups was not statistically significant (4.9% versus 8.7%; P=0.68). The default rates among women on cytologic surveillance and immediate colposcopy were 37% and 12.5%, respectively (P=0.0002).

Conclusion: Although the progression rate of LSIL is low, a high persistence rate and higher default rate from cytologic surveillance highlight the need to consider immediate referral for colposcopy, where available, for all women with a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of LSIL in this environment.

Keywords: Enugu; cytologic surveillance; immediate colposcopy; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ugboma HAA, Aburoma HLS. Pap smear: an important screening technique for preventing and detecting cervical cancer. Continental Journal of Medical Research. 2010;4:13–17.
    1. Shafi MI. Premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix. In: Edmonds DK, editor. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 7th ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.
    1. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, et al. 2012 Updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:829–846. - PubMed
    1. Bansal N, Wright JD, Cohen CJ, Herzog TJ. Natural history of established cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 lesions. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1763–1766. - PubMed
    1. Eggington S, Hadwin R, Brennan A, Walker P. Modelling the impact of referral guideline changes for mild dyskaryosis on colposcopy services in England Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, 2006. NHSCSP Publication No. 24. [Accessed October 30, 2014]. Available from: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/nhscsp24.html.

LinkOut - more resources