Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;15 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):S6.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S15-S6. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

Adjusting protein graphs based on graph entropy

Adjusting protein graphs based on graph entropy

Sheng-Lung Peng et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014.

Abstract

Measuring protein structural similarity attempts to establish a relationship of equivalence between polymer structures based on their conformations. In several recent studies, researchers have explored protein-graph remodeling, instead of looking a minimum superimposition for pairwise proteins. When graphs are used to represent structured objects, the problem of measuring object similarity become one of computing the similarity between graphs. Graph theory provides an alternative perspective as well as efficiency. Once a protein graph has been created, its structural stability must be verified. Therefore, a criterion is needed to determine if a protein graph can be used for structural comparison. In this paper, we propose a measurement for protein graph remodeling based on graph entropy. We extend the concept of graph entropy to determine whether a graph is suitable for representing a protein. The experimental results suggest that when applied, graph entropy helps a conformational on protein graph modeling. Furthermore, it indirectly contributes to protein structural comparison if a protein graph is solid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of protein graph remodeling.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The four graphs, C4, K4, P4, and S4.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effects for increasing and decreasing edges from a graph.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A set of connected 5-node graphs.

References

    1. Bunke H. Graph Matching: Theoretical Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications. Proc Vision Interface 2000. 2000;21
    1. Gilbert D, Westhead DR, Nagano N, Thornton JM. Motif-based searching in TOPS protein topology databases. Bioinformatics. 1999;15(4):317–326. - PubMed
    1. Ehrig H, Engels G, Kreowski H. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation: Applications, Languages and Tools. World Scientific Publishing Company; 1997.
    1. Vishveshwara S, Brinda K, Kannan N. Protein Structure: Insights from Graph Theory. Journal of the Comp Chem. 2002;1:187–211.
    1. Lund O, Hansen J, Brunak S, Bohr J. Relationship between Protein Structure and Geometrical Constraints. Protein Science: a Publication of the Protein Society. 1996;5(11):2217–2225. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources