Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Dec 4:12:122.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-122.

Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles

Vitaly A Kushnir et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Background: To assess whether an objective performance criterion for in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers can be established.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2011 National ART Surveillance System data for 451 U.S. IVF centers, 137 of which were included in the analysis since they performed >20 fresh embryo transfers per age group and >20 fresh oocyte donor transfers. The analysis of autologous cycles was restricted to women under age 40. The main outcome measure was correlation between center-specific live birth rates (LBR) in autologous and donor oocyte cycles.

Results: 55.6% donor and 46.7%, 39.1% and 28.7% (for ages <35, 35-37 and 38-40 years) autologous cycles resulted in live births per fresh embryo transfer. Donor LBR predicted autologous LBR (< 35 years, P < 0.001; 35 - 38 years, P < 0.001; 38 - 40 years, P = 0.015). Clinics with high prevalence of patients with diminished ovarian reserve had lower autologous LBR per age group (P = 0.015). Every 10% increase in donor LBR increased odds of autologous LBR above the age-adjusted national average by 68% (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.36 - 2.07; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Since center-specific donor and autologous IVF cycle outcomes correlate, and as donor cycles reflect fewer patient covariates, they represent a first comparable performance measure between centers, allowing for internal as well as external quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinic specific autologous oocyte LBR compared to donor oocyte LBR in 2011.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for disease control and prevention, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) [http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm] Accessed 01/27/2014
    1. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART)[http://sart.org/find_frm.html] Accessed 1/27/2014
    1. Kushnir VA, Vidali A, Barad DH, Gleicher N. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Kushnir VA, Jamieson DJ. Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):239–347. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):3–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh028. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources