Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;64(5):1830-40.
doi: 10.2337/db14-1504. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

Sixty-five common genetic variants and prediction of type 2 diabetes

Collaborators, Affiliations

Sixty-five common genetic variants and prediction of type 2 diabetes

Philippa J Talmud et al. Diabetes. 2015 May.

Abstract

We developed a 65 type 2 diabetes (T2D) variant-weighted gene score to examine the impact on T2D risk assessment in a U.K.-based consortium of prospective studies, with subjects initially free from T2D (N = 13,294; 37.3% women; mean age 58.5 [38-99] years). We compared the performance of the gene score with the phenotypically derived Framingham Offspring Study T2D risk model and then the two in combination. Over the median 10 years of follow-up, 804 participants developed T2D. The odds ratio for T2D (top vs. bottom quintiles of gene score) was 2.70 (95% CI 2.12-3.43). With a 10% false-positive rate, the genetic score alone detected 19.9% incident cases, the Framingham risk model 30.7%, and together 37.3%. The respective area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were 0.60 (95% CI 0.58-0.62), 0.75 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.77), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.78). The combined risk score net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 8.1% (5.0 to 11.2; P = 3.31 × 10(-7)). While BMI stratification into tertiles influenced the NRI (BMI ≤24.5 kg/m(2), 27.6% [95% CI 17.7-37.5], P = 4.82 × 10(-8); 24.5-27.5 kg/m(2), 11.6% [95% CI 5.8-17.4], P = 9.88 × 10(-5); >27.5 kg/m(2), 2.6% [95% CI -1.4 to 6.6], P = 0.20), age categories did not. The addition of the gene score to a phenotypic risk model leads to a potentially clinically important improvement in discrimination of incident T2D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot showing the 10% detection rate for all seven studies for (A) the Framingham phenotypic score alone and (B) Framingham T2D score plus the externally weighted gene score. DR10, 10% detection rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The distribution of the 65-SNP gene score, weighted by the external published β-values in the combined studies. Superimposed are the log ORs for T2D.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The receiver operating curve for the seven combined studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatter plot showing the correlation between Framingham T2D score and Framingham T2D score plus the externally weighted gene score. A: Those who remained T2D free. B: Incident T2D cases.

Comment in

References

    1. Færch K, Witte DR, Tabák AG, et al. . Trajectories of cardiometabolic risk factors before diagnosis of three subtypes of type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the longitudinal Whitehall II cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013;1:43–51 - PubMed
    1. Sinharoy K, Mandal L, Chakrabarti S, Paul UK, Bandyopadhyay R, Basu AK. A study on clinical and biochemical profile of low body weight type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Indian Med Assoc 2008;106:747–750 - PubMed
    1. Noble D, Mathur R, Dent T, Meads C, Greenhalgh T. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ 2011;343:d7163. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyssenko V, Laakso M. Genetic screening for the risk of type 2 diabetes: worthless or valuable? Diabetes Care 2013;36(Suppl. 2):S120–S126 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson PW, Meigs JB, Sullivan L, Fox CS, Nathan DM, D’Agostino RB Sr. Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1068–1074 - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding