Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 4;18(6):658.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y.

Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults

Affiliations

Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults

Carol L Hodgson et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations on safety parameters for mobilizing adult, mechanically ventilated, intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: A systematic literature review was followed by a meeting of 23 multidisciplinary ICU experts to seek consensus regarding the safe mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients.

Results: Safety considerations were summarized in four categories: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological and other. Consensus was achieved on all criteria for safe mobilization, with the exception being levels of vasoactive agents. Intubation via an endotracheal tube was not a contraindication to early mobilization and a fraction of inspired oxygen less than 0.6 with a percutaneous oxygen saturation more than 90% and a respiratory rate less than 30 breaths/minute were considered safe criteria for in- and out-of-bed mobilization if there were no other contraindications. At an international meeting, 94 multidisciplinary ICU clinicians concurred with the proposed recommendations.

Conclusion: Consensus recommendations regarding safety criteria for mobilization of adult, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU have the potential to guide ICU rehabilitation whilst minimizing the risk of adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Color coding definitions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Respiratory safety considerations. PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cardiovascular safety considerations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neurological safety considerations. RASS, Richmond Agitation Assessment Scale; CAM-ICU, confusion assessment method for the ICU.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Medical, surgical and other safety considerations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee SM, Schneider SM, Feiveson AH, Macias BR, Smith SM, Watenpaugh DE, Hargens AR. WISE-2005: Countermeasures to prevent muscle deconditioning during bed rest in women. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2014;116:654–667. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00590.2013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee SM, Moore AD, Everett ME, Stenger MB, Platts SH. Aerobic exercise deconditioning and countermeasures during bed rest. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010;81:52–63. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.2474.2010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiller K. Physiotherapy in intensive care: towards an evidence-based practice. Chest. 2000;118:1801–1813. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiller K. Physiotherapy in intensive care: an updated systematic review. Chest. 2013;144:825–847. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2930. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiller K. Safety issues that should be considered when mobilizing critically ill patients. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:35–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.11.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types