Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;21(4):304-8.
doi: 10.1111/cns.12359. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Targeting the neurovascular unit in brain trauma

Affiliations
Review

Targeting the neurovascular unit in brain trauma

Josephine Lok et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Although the neurovascular unit was originally developed as a conceptual framework for stroke, it is now recognized that these cell-cell interactions play critical roles in many other CNS disorders as well. In brain trauma, perturbations within the neurovascular unit may be especially important. Changes in neurovascular coupling may disrupt blood flow and metabolic regulation. Disruption of transmitter release-reuptake kinetics in neurons and astrocytes may augment excitotoxicity. Alterations in gliovascular signaling may underlie blood-brain barrier disruptions and traumatic edema. Perturbations in cell-cell signaling between all neuronal, glial, and vascular compartments may increase susceptibility to cell death. Finally, repairing the brain after trauma requires the integrated restoration of all neural, glial, and vascular connectivity for effective functional recovery. Just as in stroke, saving neurons alone may also be insufficient for treating brain trauma. In this minireview, we attempt to briefly highlight some of these pathways to underscore the importance of rescuing the entire neurovascular unit in brain trauma.

Keywords: Endothelial; Glia; Neuron; Neuroprotection; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross talk between multiple cell types in CNS and non‐CNS compartments after TBI. After TBI, perturbations in cell–cell signaling between all neuronal, glial, and vascular compartments may increase susceptibility to cell death. Changes in neurovascular coupling may disrupt blood flow and metabolic regulation. Disruption of transmitter release‐reuptake kinetics in neurons and astrocytes may augment excitotoxicity. Alterations in gliovascular signaling may underlie blood–brain barrier disruptions and traumatic edema. Finally, repairing the brain after trauma requires the integrated restoration of all neural, glial, and vascular connectivity for effective functional recovery.

References

    1. Raghupathi R. Cell death mechanisms following traumatic brain injury. Brain Pathol 2004;14:215–222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loane DJ, Faden AI. Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: Translational challenges and emerging therapeutic strategies. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010;31:596–604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vespa P, Bergsneider M, Hattori N, et al. Metabolic crisis without brain ischemia is common after traumatic brain injury: A combined microdialysis and positron emission tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005; 25:763–774. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin NA, Patwardhan RV, Alexander MJ, et al. Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: Hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm. J Neurosurg 1997;87:9–19. - PubMed
    1. Golding EM, Robertson CS, Bryan RM Jr. The consequences of traumatic brain injury on cerebral blood flow and autoregulation: A review. Clin Exp Hypertens 1999;21:299–332. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources