Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 25475772
- PMCID: PMC4320414
- DOI: 10.4317/medoral.20009
Effect of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A double-blind randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication after third molar surgery. One of the most studied agents in its prevention is chlorhexidine (CHX), which has proved to be effective.
Objectives: The aim of this randomized double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel placed intra-alveolar in the prevention of AO after the extraction of mandibular third molars and to analyze the impact of risk factors such as smoking and oral contraceptives in the development of AO.
Study design: The study was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial performed in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit of Hospital Vall d'Hebron and was approved by the Ethics Committee. A total of 160 patients randomly received 0.2% bioadhesive gel (80 patients) or bioadhesive placebo (80 patients).
Results: 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel applied in the alveolus after third molar extraction reduced the incidence of dry socket by 22% compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant. Smoking and the use of oral contraceptives were not related to higher incidence of dry socket. Female patients and the difficulty of the surgery were associated with a higher incidence of AO with statistically significant differences. 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel did not produce any of the side effects related to chlorhexidine rinses.
Conclusions: A 22% reduction of the incidence of alveolar osteitis with the application of 0.2% bioadhesive chlorhexidine gel compared to placebo with differences that were not statistically significant was found in this clinical trial. The lack of adverse reactions and complications related to chlorhexidine gel supports its clinical use specially in simple extractions and adds some advantages compared to the rinses in terms of duration of the treatment and reduction of staining and taste disturbance.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Randomized, double-blind study of effectiveness of intra-alveolar application of chlorhexidine gel in reducing incidence of alveolar osteitis and bleeding complications in mandibular third molar surgery in patients with bleeding disorders.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.022. Epub 2010 Mar 25. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20346565 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Jan 1;20(1):e82-7. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19932. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015. PMID: 25475768 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of intra-alveolar placement of 0.2% chlorhexidine bioadhesive gel on dry socket incidence and postsurgical pain: a double-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.J Orofac Pain. 2013 Summer;27(3):256-62. doi: 10.11607/jop.1142. J Orofac Pain. 2013. PMID: 23882458 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of intra-alveolar 0.2% chlorhexidine gel on alveolar osteitis: a meta-analysis.Oral Dis. 2017 Jul;23(5):598-608. doi: 10.1111/odi.12553. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Oral Dis. 2017. PMID: 27479137 Review.
-
A review of dry socket: a double-blind study on the effectiveness of clindamycin in reducing the incidence of dry socket.J Can Dent Assoc. 1992 Jan;58(1):43-52. J Can Dent Assoc. 1992. PMID: 1544038 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Feb;9(1):75-81. doi: 10.1002/cre2.675. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023. PMID: 36245293 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Chlorhexidine after Oral Surgery Procedures on Wound Healing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;12(10):1552. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101552. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37887254 Free PMC article.
-
Preventing Alveolar Osteitis After Molar Extraction Using Chlorhexidine Rinse and Gel: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Nurs Res. 2020 Sep 21;29(1):e137. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000401. J Nurs Res. 2020. PMID: 32956135 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial.J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Oct 1;11(10):e871-e876. doi: 10.4317/jced.55743. eCollection 2019 Oct. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019. PMID: 31636855 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of different methods used for dry socket prevention and risk factor analysis: A systematic review.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Nov 1;22(6):e750-e758. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21705. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017. PMID: 29053647 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blum IR. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:309–17. - PubMed
-
- Caso A, Hung LK, Beirne OR. Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:155–9. - PubMed
-
- Hermesch CB, Hilton TJ, Biesbrock AR, Baker RA, Cain-Hamlin J, McClanahan SF. Perioperative use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis: efficacy and risk factor analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:381–7. - PubMed
-
- Ren YF, Malmstrom HS. Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Third Molar Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1909–1921. - PubMed
-
- Zeitler DL. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: a dissenting opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:61–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources